Skip to main content

Official Journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology

Table 4 Hip scores: 1 = Harris Hip Score; 2 = Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Score [49]; 3 = Oxford Hip Score; 4 = Toronto Extremity Salvage Score [50]; 5 = Lower Extremity Activity Score [51]; 6 = 1 very good, 8 good, 5 fair, 2 poor; 7 = 4 excellent, 3 very good, 4 good, 5 fair, 2 poor, 2 bad

From: Proximal femoral replacement for non-neoplastic conditions: a systematic review on current outcomes

Study

N

Hip score before

Hip score after

Bosquet et al., 1980 [30]

7

Sim and Chao, 1981 [32]

21

85 (63–98)1

Malkani et al., 1995 [16]

50

46 (31–83)1

80 (50–91)1

Haentjens et al., 1996 [31]

19

MDA6

Klein et al., 2005 [22]

21

71 (56–90)1

Shih et al., 2007 [33]

12

30 (16–42)1

83 (68–92)1

Parvizi et al., 2007 [17]

48

371

651

Jaiswal et al., 2008 [34]

27

30 (5–58)1

72 (44–100)1

Schoenfeld et al., 2008 [35]

22

MDA7

Bertani et al., 2009 [36]

8

13.8/6.82

Gebert et al., 2010 [37]

45

30 (8–63)1

78 (57–95)1

Al-Taki et al., 2011 [10]

36

34.93

54.93

Dean et al., 2012 [38]

8

71 (64–85)1

McLean et al., 2012 [20]

20

68 (32–98)4

Colman et al., 2014 [43]

21

Calori et al., 2014 [39]

21

Patel et al., 2014 [40]

5

24 (21–27)2

Lundh et al., 2014 [23]

5

Grammatopoulos et al., 2016 [11]

80

28 (4–48)3

Viste et al., 2017 [19]

44

43 (26–83)1

68 (21–88)1

Corona et al., 2018 [44]

14

31 (12–46)5

Khajuria et al., 2018 [45]

37

8 (0–16)3

31 (19–40)3

Alvand et al., 2018 [21]

40

22 (4–39)3

De Martino et al., 2019 [41]

41

Fahad et al., 2019 [42]

21

681

66.51

Dieckmann et al., 2019 [46]

49

69 (40–94)1

Fenelon et al., 2020 [18]

79

Total

801