Skip to main content
Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology

Official Journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology

Download PDF

Early postoperative pain as a risk factor of shoulder stiffness after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology volume 22, Article number: 25 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The role of postoperative pain in incidence of shoulder stiffness (SS) after shoulder arthroscopy has not been thoroughly investigated. The present study was conducted to assess the effects of early postoperative pain (EPOP) on onset of SS after arthroscopic rotator cuff (RC) repair.

Materials and methods

In a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database, 335 patients who underwent arthroscopic RC repair were evaluated. RC tendons were sutured to the bone using the double-row technique. EPOP was evaluated 1 week after surgery using the visual analog scale (VAS). SS was assessed 3 months after surgery and was categorized into moderate or severe based on shoulder range of motion (ROM). Each type of complication including SS was identified and recorded.

Results

Postoperative shoulder stiffness (POSS) was identified in 121 patients (36.2%) that was moderate in 86 patients (70.1%) and severe in 35 patients (28.9%). After 1 week, VAS pain score was equal to 7.7 ± 3.1 and 4.5 ± 2.1 in the patients with and without stiffness, respectively (p < 0.001). Diabetes and traumatic tear were found to be associated with postoperative stiffness (p = 0.046 and p < 0.001, respectively). Similar associations were found on multivariate analysis of data. VAS pain score was higher in the patients with severe stiffness compared with those with moderate stiffness (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Our findings revealed that EPOP is associated with shoulder stiffness after arthroscopic RC repair. Therefore, strategies to ameliorate EPOP could be opted to decrease rate of POSS.

Level of evidence

Level IV

Introduction

Surgical intervention is widely used for treatment of rotator cuff (RC) tear, which is generally associated with good outcomes and low rate of complications [1, 2]. Postoperative stiffness (POS) is one of the most common complications after arthroscopic RC repair [3]. Restrictions on the patients’ quality of life have led the researchers to focus their studies on risk factors of shoulder stiffness (SS). Diabetes and postoperative shoulder stiffness (POSS), as well as prolonged immobilization and poor patient compliance with postoperative rehabilitation, have been reported to be associated with POS after arthroscopic RC repair [4, 5]. Overall, risk of POS has remained at a high level of 32.7% [6].

Inability to perform early shoulder movements after arthroscopic RC repair has been suggested as a determining factor in incidence of POSS [5]. It is hypothesized that postoperative pain might cause less shoulder movement as well as the reduced compliance with rehabilitation programs, thereby increasing risk of POSS. If this hypothesis is confirmed, rate of POS could be reduced in a significant number of the patients by adequately controlling early postoperative pain (EPOP).

The role of postoperative pain in the incidence of stiffness following shoulder arthroscopy has not been thoroughly investigated. Therefore, the present study was carried out to assess the effects of postoperative pain on onset of SS after arthroscopic RC repair.

Materials and methods

This study, which was a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database, was approved by the review board of our institute under the code IR.IUMS.FMD.REC.1398.471, and informed written consent was obtained from the patients to publish their medical data. During 2012–2018, patients who underwent arthroscopic RC repair were identified in our university hospital. Exclusion criteria were POSS, arthritic shoulder, revision repair, previous shoulder surgery, and concurrent spinal cord lesions. SS was categorized into moderate or severe levels according to passive range of motion (ROM) as defined in the study by Tauro et al. [7]. A deficit of 25–70° in the total passive ROM (abduction, forward elevation, external rotation, and internal rotation) was considered as moderate stiffness, while a deficit > 70° was considered as severe stiffness. Arthritic shoulders were identified according to the Walch classification system and excluded [8]. Patients with superior labral tear from anterior to posterior (SLAP) and Bankart lesion were also excluded. Patients lost to follow-up were excluded from the study as well (n = 13). Of 493 patients who underwent arthroscopic RC repair in our center during the study period, 335 patients met the inclusion criteria and were selected for this study.

Surgeries were performed by the same senior surgeon (ASA) on the patients in beach chair position and under general anesthesia. RC tendons were sutured to the bone using the double-row technique [9]. We performed a long head of biceps (LHB) tenotomy in patients older than 50 years of age and a tenodesis in those younger than 50 years. Tear size was assessed intraoperatively and was classified into four categories: small (<1 cm), medium (1–3 cm), large (3–5 cm), and massive (> 5 cm) [10].

The patients were discharged within 24 h after the operation. For controlling postoperative pain, pregabalin (75 mg BID) and celecoxib (200 mg BID) were administered for 2 weeks after operation. A tramadol tablet (25 mg) was administered for further pain control between days 3 and 7, in 82 (24.4%) of the patients.

The operated shoulder was immobilized in a sling for 2 weeks. Pendulum exercises and passive flexion up to 90° in sleeping position were started after 2 weeks. Active-assisted ROM exercises were started after 4 weeks. Strengthening exercises were performed after 2 months. Exercises were supervised by a musculoskeletal physiotherapist.

Follow-up visits were performed after 1 week (7.3 ± 1.6) and 3 months (95.1 ± 6.3). Pain level was evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain). Each type of complication including SS was identified and recorded.

Statistical analysis

SPSS software for Windows version 16 (Chicago, Illinois, USA) was used for statistical analysis of the data. Descriptive data were reported as mean with standard deviation or number and percentage. Shapiro–Wilk test was used for evaluation of normality of the data. The independent-samples t-test or its nonparametric counterpart (Mann–Whitney U test) was used for comparison of mean values between two independent groups. The χ2 test was used for evaluation of statistical association between categorical variables. For eliminating the confounding effects, significant factors in univariate analysis were included in a binary regression model. A p-value of < 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.

Results

Characteristics of the patients are presented in Table 1.

Table 1 Characteristic features of the patients who underwent arthroscopic repair for rotator cuff tear
Full size table

POSS was identified in 121 patients (36.2%). After 1 week, VAS pain was equal to 7.7 ± 3.1 and 4.5 ± 2.1 in the patients with and without stiffness (p < 0.001), respectively. Diabetes and traumatic tear were found to be associated with incidence of POS (p = 0.046 and p < 0.001, respectively). The subgroups of the patients with and without POS were similar in terms of other characteristics, including mean age (p = 0.71), gender (p = 0.85), and tear size (p = 0.57) (Table 2). Predictive values of postoperative pain and other postoperative variables are reported in Table 3.

Table 2 Comparison of characteristic features between patients with and without postoperative stiffness
Full size table
Table 3 Binary logistic regression model showing predictive value of variables for postoperative shoulder stiffness following arthroscopic repair of RCT
Full size table

Stiffness level was moderate in 86 patients (70.1%) and severe in 35 (28.9%). VAS pain score was higher in the patients with severe stiffness (p < 0.001). Rate of severe stiffness was higher in the patients with traumatic RC tear compared with those with atraumatic (p = 0.04). Tear size did not influence severity of stiffness (p = 0.41)‏ (Table 4).

Table 4 Comparison of characteristic features between patients with moderate and severe postoperative stiffness
Full size table

Discussion

Results of this study showed that postoperative pain was a risk factor for development of SS after arthroscopic RC repair and was strongly associated with severity of stiffness. Diabetes and traumatic onset of RC tear were found as additional risk factors of POSS. These findings have certain implications in the clinical practice and need to be considered.

Namdari et al. revealed that early postoperative limitation in ROM is associated with a higher risk of POSS [11]. The role of early postoperative motion to prevent SS has been discussed in other investigations as well [5]. Low compliance with postoperative rehabilitation programs has also been frequently reported as a risk factor of POSS [12,13,14]. On the other hand, worsening pain during exercise presents a barrier to following exercises. Accordingly, it can be said that SS in the patients with severe postoperative pain is caused by the decreased compliance with rehabilitation program. Thus, controlling of postoperative pain might reduce rate of SS after arthroscopic repair of RC.

Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were used for controlling postoperative pain in the present cohort. These medications potentially contribute to reduction of the pain and stiffness through their antiinflammatory activity [15]. However, postoperative stiffness was still observed in a significant number of our patients. Recent studies have suggested corticosteroid injection as a safe and efficacious modality for treatment of persistent postoperative shoulder pain during the recovery phase [16, 17].

Herein, all the surgeries were performed under general anesthesia. However, a combination of general and regional anesthesia (interscalene block) is known to facilitate postoperative pain management in shoulder surgeries [18]. Therefore, supplemental regional anesthesia could be used to reduce postoperative pain and its potential subsequent stiffness.

Similar to our study, Namdari et al. introduced diabetes mellitus as a risk factor of SS [11]. Diabetic stiff hand syndrome, also known as diabetic cheiroarthropathy, is a condition characterized by alterations in collagen production, breakdown, and composition, leading to limited mobility of joints in the hands and fingers, presented as flexion contractures [19]. Therefore, the role of diabetes as a risk factor of POSS should also be taken into account.

Huberty et al. reported SS in 24 (4.9%) out of 489 patients who underwent arthroscopic RC repair. According to their results, patients less than 50 years of age and with larger tears were less likely to develop SS after arthroscopic RC repair [20]. Chung et al. reported POSS in 27.8% of patients (80/288). In this study, contrary to the study by Huberty et al., older age and larger size of the tear were found to be associated with a higher risk of POS [21]. Age and tear size were not significantly associated with incidence or severity of stiffness in the present series.

Seo et al. evaluated risk factors of POSS in 119 patients who underwent arthroscopic RC repair. Based on their results, a higher percentage of stiffness was seen in full-thickness tears in comparison with a partial-thickness tear. In addition, patients with a traumatic tear had a statistically higher rate of POSS [22]. Herein, the patients with partial-thickness tears were not included. However, the role of partial thickness in genesis of pain is controversial, in that, sometimes, small and partial tears are more likely to lead to POS than large tears [23]. Our findings showed that traumatic RC tear was a risk factor of POSS, in line with the study by Seo et al. [22]. This is probably due to the presence of associated injuries in traumatic RC tear, such as acromioclavicular joint injury, labral injuries, bruise or fracture of shoulder bones, strain of intrinsic and extrinsic shoulder muscles, and neurologic injuries to the axillary and/or suprascapular nerve.

Several studies have investigated the risk factors of SS after arthroscopic RC repair [24,25,26]; however, studies exploring the role of postoperative pain in the onset of SS are lacking. Basic science research has investigated the role of different inflammation mediators in genesis of pain in the case of SS‏. In this respect, overexpression of inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin 1 (IL-‏‏1), interleukin 6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and substance P, may indirectly increase risk of POSS ‏through increasing local pain level and causing limited ROM. Mediators such as substance P ‏might also directly induce incidence of POSS through initiating a fibrotic cascade by stimulation of transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) expression [5, 27].

Management of POSS after arthroscopic RC repair is a controversial issue [24]. The need for joint immobilization to preserve biologic healing of the RC may be implicated in the development of POS [24]. Yet‏, several other factors might contribute to this pathogenesis.‏ The type of technique used for RC repair can influence the level of POS, and arthroscopic repair has been reported to be associated with less POS than open repair [28, 29]. Single-tendon tears have been reported more likely to develop POSS than multiple-tendon involvement [20]. Moreover, postoperative pain and stiffness has been associated with repair of subscapularis tear, accounting for up to 53% of the cuff movements [30, 31]. Associated procedures LHB tenotomy or tenodesis, acromioplasty, and capsulotomy [32], and glenohumeral/acromioclavicular osteoarthritis could also increase the rate of POSS [29, 33, 34].

This study has some limitations. The retrospective design and the data of only two follow-up time-points are the main limitations of the study.

Conclusion

EPOP seems to play a prominent role in incidence of SS after arthroscopic RC repair, probably through reducing compliance with rehabilitation programs. Appropriate strategies of postoperative pain control could significantly reduce the risk to develop a stiff shoulder.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

RCT:

Rotator cuff tear

ROM:

Range of motion

VAS:

Visual analog scale

EPOP:

Early postoperative pain

SS:

Shoulder stiffness

RC:

Rotator cuff

POSS:

Postoperative shoulder stiffness

POS:

Postoperative stiffness

SLAP:

Superior labral tear from anterior to posterior

LHB:

Long head of biceps

NSAIDs:

Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs

References

  1. Sambandam SN, Khanna V, Gul A, Mounasamy V (2015) Rotator cuff tears: an evidence based approach. World J Orthop 6(11):902–918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Audigé L, Blum R, Müller AM, Flury M, Durchholz H (2015) Complications following arthroscopic rotator cuff tear repair: a systematic review of terms and definitions with focus on shoulder stiffness. Orthop J Sports Med 3(6):2325967115587861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brislin KJ, Field LD, Savoie FH III (2007) Complications after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg 23(2):124–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Vastamäki H, Vastamäki M (2014) Postoperative stiff shoulder after open rotator cuff repair: a 3- to 20-year follow-up study. Scand J Surg 103(4):263–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cucchi D, Marmotti A, De Giorgi S, Costa A, Dapolito R, Conca M et al (2017) Risk factors for shoulder stiffness: current concepts. Joints 5(04):217–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Barden B, DiVenere J, Singh H, Mazzocca AD (2015) Postoperative shoulder stiffness after rotator cuff repair. Shoulder stiffness. Springer, pp 49–73

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Tauro JC (2006) Stiffness and rotator cuff tears: incidence, arthroscopic findings, and treatment results. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Related Surg 22(6):581–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Walch G, Badet R, Boulahia A, Khoury A (1999) Morphologic study of the glenoid in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty 14(6):756–760

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Abdelshahed M, Mahure SA, Kaplan DJ, Mollon B, Zuckerman JD, Kwon YW et al (2016) Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: double-row transosseous equivalent suture bridge technique. Arthrosc Tech 5(6):e1297–e1304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. DeOrio J, Cofield RH (1984) Results of a second attempt at surgical repair of a failed initial rotator-cuff repair. J Bone Jt Surg (American volume) 66(4):563–567

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Namdari S, Green A (2010) Range of motion limitation after rotator cuff repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 19(2):290–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Silliman JF, Hawkins RJ (1991) Current concepts and recent advances in the athlete’s shoulder. Clin Sports Med 10(4):693–705

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Goldberg BA, Scarlat MM, Harryman Ii DT (1999) Management of the stiff shoulder. J Orthop Sci 4(6):462–471

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Vo A, Zhou H, Dumont G, Fogerty S, Rosso C, Li X (2013) Physical therapy and rehabilitation after rotator cuff repair: a review of current concepts. Int J Phys Med Rehabil 1(142):2

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gunaydin C, Bilge SS (2018) Effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs at the molecular level. Eurasian J Med 50(2):116–121

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Shin S-J, Do N-H, Lee J, Ko Y-W (2016) Efficacy of a subacromial corticosteroid injection for persistent pain after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med 44(9):2231–2236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Perdreau A, Joudet T (2015) Efficacy of multimodal analgesia injection combined with corticosteroids after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 101(8):S337–S345

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Zoremba M, Kratz T, Dette F, Wulf H, Steinfeldt T, Wiesmann T (2015) Supplemental interscalene blockade to general anesthesia for shoulder arthroscopy: effects on fast track capability, analgesic quality, and lung function. Biomed Res Int 2015:325012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Aljahlan M, Lee K-C, Toth E (1999) Limited joint mobility in diabetes: diabetic cheiroarthropathy may be a clue to more serious complications. Postgrad Med 105(2):99–106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Huberty DP, Schoolfield JD, Brady PC, Vadala AP, Arrigoni P, Burkhart SS (2009) Incidence and treatment of postoperative stiffness following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg 25(8):880–890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chung SW, Huong CB, Kim SH, Oh JH (2013) Shoulder stiffness after rotator cuff repair: risk factors and influence on outcome. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg 29(2):290–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Seo SS, Choi JS, An KC, Kim JH, Kim SB (2012) The factors affecting stiffness occurring with rotator cuff tear. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21(3):304–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Brownlow HC, Smith C, Corner T, Neen D, Pennington R (2009) Pain and stiffness in partial-thickness rotator cuff tears. Am J Orthop 38(7):338–340

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Papalia R, Franceschi F, Vasta S, Gallo A, Maffulli N, Denaro V (2012) Shoulder stiffness and rotator cuff repair. Br Med Bull 104(1):163–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Schairer WW, Nwachukwu BU, Fu MC, Warren RF (2018) Risk factors for short-term complications after rotator cuff repair in the United States. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Related Surg 34(4):1158–1163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Koorevaar RC, van‘t Riet E, Ipskamp M, Bulstra SK (2017) Incidence and prognostic factors for postoperative frozen shoulder after shoulder surgery: a prospective cohort study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 137(3):293–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Fong G, Backman LJ, Alfredson H, Scott A, Danielson P (2017) The effects of substance P and acetylcholine on human tenocyte proliferation converge mechanistically via TGF-β1. PLoS ONE 12(3):e0174101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Huang R, Wang S, Wang Y, Qin X, Sun Y (2016) Systematic review of all-arthroscopic versus mini-open repair of rotator cuff tears: a meta-analysis. Sci Rep 6(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Guity MR, Eraghi AS (2015) Open rotator cuff tear repair using deltopectoral approach. Med Arch 69(5):298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Halder A, Zobitz M, Schultz F, An K (2000) Structural properties of the subscapularis tendon. J Orthop Res 18(5):829–834

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Altintas B, Bradley H, Logan C, Delvecchio B, Anderson N, Millett PJ (2019) Rehabilitation following subscapularis tendon repair. Int J Sports Phys Ther 14(2):318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Werner BC, Pehlivan HC, Hart JM, Carson EW, Diduch DR, Miller MD et al (2014) Increased post-operative stiffness after arthroscopic suprapectoral biceps tenodesis. Orthop J Sports Med 2(3_suppl):2325967114S00018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ansok CB, Muh SJ (2018) Optimal management of glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Orthopedic Res Rev 10:9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Eraghi AS (2020) Acromioplasty in the surgical operations of partial-thickness rotator cuff tears: a comprehensive review. J Family Med Prim Care 9(2):520

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Rasool Akram Medical Complex Clinical Research Development Center (RCRDC) for its technical and editorial assistance.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedics, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Mohammad Reza Guity

  2. Department of Orthopaedics, Rasool Akram Medical Complex, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Niayesh Ave., Sattarkhan St, Tehran, Iran

    Amir Sobhani Eraghi

  3. Minimally Invasive Surgery Research Center & Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Fatemeh Sadat Hosseini-Baharanchi

Authors
  1. Mohammad Reza Guity
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Amir Sobhani Eraghi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fatemeh Sadat Hosseini-Baharanchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MRG and ASE designed the study and performed the clinical examinations; ASE and FSHB wrote the initial draft. FSHB analyzed and interpreted the patient data. MRG revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amir Sobhani Eraghi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This study was approved by the Ethic Committee of Iran University of Medical Sciences. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent for publication

Consent was obtained from the patients to publish their medical data.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guity, M.R., Sobhani Eraghi, A. & Hosseini-Baharanchi, F.S. Early postoperative pain as a risk factor of shoulder stiffness after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. J Orthop Traumatol 22, 25 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-021-00585-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-021-00585-9

Keywords