Complications of calcific tendinitis of the shoulder: a concise review
© The Author(s) 2015
Received: 27 October 2014
Accepted: 30 January 2015
Published: 20 February 2015
Calcific tendinitis (CT) of the rotator cuff (RC) muscles in the shoulder is a disorder which remains asymptomatic in a majority of patients. Once manifested, it can present in different ways which can have negative effects both socially and professionally for the patient. The treatment modalities can be either conservative or surgical. There is poor literature evidence on the complications of this condition with little consensus on the treatment of choice. In this review, the literature was extensively searched in order to study and compile together the complications of CT of the shoulder and present it in a clear form to ease the understanding for all the professionals involved in the management of this disorder. Essentially there are five major complications of CT: pain, adhesive capsulitis, RC tears, greater tuberosity osteolysis and ossifying tendinitis. All the above complications have been explained right from their origin to the control measures required for the relief of the patient.
Level of evidence 5.
Calcifying tendinitis (CT) of the shoulder is a frequently occurring painful disorder characterized by the presence of calcified deposits in the tendons of the rotator cuff (RC) mainly affecting the supraspinatus tendon but occasionally is seen in the infraspinatus and subscapularis [1–5].
To our knowledge no review articles have been elaborated on the complications of CT. Hence, in this paper a literature review has been done on the various complications or sequelae of the CT of the shoulder preceded by a brief overview on its histopathology, classification and diagnostic imaging.
Histopathology and classification
The evolution of CT essentially passes through 3 distinct stages: pre-calcific, calcifying and post-calcific . In the pre-calcific stage, numerous factors stimulate a metaplastic change of the tenocytes into chondrocytes. This is followed by the calcific stage which is subdivided into three phases—formation, resting and resorption—characterized by deposition of amorphous calcium phosphate followed by vascularisation and finally by resorption which coincides with significant clinical pain. The post calcific stage is demonstrated by the collagenisation of the lesion by fibroblasts . Intra-operatively, the gross specimens of CT can be either in the form of a sandy tough mass or a toothpaste-like fluid or an amorphous mass composed of many small round or ovoid bodies . The material of these deposits has been identified to be calcium carbonate apatite . This carbonate apatite has been further classified as an A and B-type apatite . Chiou et al.  studied the chemical components in CT and found that both types of the carbonate apatite varied in quantities during the formative, resting and resorption phases. Histochemical studies have demonstrated the presence of extracellular matrix vesicles near calcified deposition of the RC [26, 31, 32] and the authors have tried to correlate this finding in the pathogenesis of CT. Normally, the vesicles are inhibited from mineralization but in the presence of any pathology, the inhibitory stimulus may be lost leading to vesicles getting mineralized.
Radiological classification of the calcific tendinitis of the shoulder according to the current literature evidence
Bosworth et al. 
Large (>1.5 cm)
Medium (in between)
Small (rarely seen)
Depalma et al. 
Type I (fluffy, amorphous and ill defined)
Type II (defined and homogeneous)
Type I (well demarcated, dense)
Type II (soft contour and dense or sharp contours and transparent)
Type III (soft contours, translucent and cloudy)
Mole’ et al. 
Type A (dense, rounded, sharply delineated)
Type B (multilobular, radiodense, sharp)
Type C (radiolucent, heterogeneous, irregular outline)
Type D (dystrophic calcific deposits)
Maier M et al.  assessed the intra- and interobserver reliability of the various classification systems using plain radiographs and CT scans and concluded that all the scores showed insufficient reliability and reproducibility. Although marginal improvement could be seen using CT scans it still remained statistically insignificant to be recommended as a routine investigation.
The first imaging modalities to identify CT were X-ray and ultrasound, as calcium deposits are readily identifiable on both. Radiograms should be performed in anterior-posterior (AP)—neutral, internal rotation and external rotation—axillary and outlet view. On radiographs calcific deposits appear homogeneous, amorphous densities without trabeculation, which allows a differentiation from heterotopic ossification or accessory ossicles . Most of calcifications are ovoid, and the margins may be smooth or ill-defined. Ultrasound (US) is advantageous in the diagnosis of CT as it helps to detect other associated conditions as well such as rotator cuff tears and long head of the biceps (LHB) pathologies ; moreover, it also characterizes deposit consistency, their tendon location, and can be helpful to assist injections and bursal lavage . According to the morphology of the calcium deposit, US has been used to classify the different type of CT due to its ability to discriminate between well defined calcifications with strong shadowing, and those with faint or absent shadowing. Chiou et al.  classifies calcific depositions into four shapes: an arc shape (echogenic arc with clear shadowing), a fragmented or punctate shape (at least two separate echogenic spots or plaques, with or without shadowing), a nodular shape (echogenic nodule without shadowing), and a cystic shape (a bold echogenic wall with an anechoic area, weak internal echoes or layering content). Conditions associated with non arc-shape calcifications include hypervascularity, widening of subacromial-subdeltoid bursa and the large size of calcifications. High resolution US in combination with color Doppler can differentiate between formative or resorptive status. In the resorptive phase, the deposits are nearly liquid and can be successfully aspirated. US has been also used with success in overhead athletes to identify CT showing a prevalence greater than that reported in the general population and that the presence of calcific tendinopathy correlates positively with age . CT scan and MRI should be reserved for doubtful cases . Computed tomography has an excellent resolution to detect calcium deposit as high density foci of solid stippled or amorphous character, but the cost and the exposure to radiation limit its use. MRI should not be used as a first line imaging modality, because deposits appear as vague regions of low signal on T1 and T2, and can be missed. Some enhancement around the deposit can be seen after contrast, and surrounding areas of hyperintensity on T2, due to peripheral edema or subacromial-subdeltoid bursal fluid are possible. MRI is advisable when the deposit is so large as to produce a strong shadow on US thus confusing it with RCTs.
The reason why pain has been considered as a complication in this review is due to the fact that this condition remains primarily asymptomatic in most of the patients . When CT becomes symptomatic, the pain is extremely severe and is typically shooting type in the area of the shoulder with no radiation to elbow or hand . In the acute phase, the pain tends to be so severe so as to allow only limited shoulder motion with marked tenderness. In the chronic or subacute phase, pain can be severe but generally shoulder motion is allowed . The cause of occurrence of pain in CT is either due to an inflammatory response to the local chemical pathology or to direct mechanical irritation . Neer classically described four types of pain peculiar to calcium deposition. First is the pain that is caused by the chemical irritation of the tissue by calcium. The second is the pain caused by tissue pressure due to its swelling. The third is an impingement-like pain caused by bursal thickening or irritation by the deposit itself. The fourth is the pain caused by a chronic stiffening of the glenohumeral joint due to voluntary prolonged immobilization by the patient to avoid possible irritation by the deposits with abduction or overhead activities . Substance P is involved in the pain transmission caused by the stimulation of A delta/C fibers by certain noxious stimuli in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord. It is also contained in the small sensory neurons of the peripheral tissue. It’s release from the sensory neurons play a significant role in mediating neurogenic inflammation . Gotoh M et al.  studied the relation of the amount of substance P in the subacromial bursa and the shoulder pain in patients with rotator cuff diseases with radioimunoassay and immunohistochemistry. He found an increase in the number of immunoreactive nerve fibres in the synovial tissue of patients with rotator cuff diseases. These fibres were predominantly located around the blood vessels, suggesting an active role in its regulation and subsequent inflammation. He also hypothesized that certain mechanical (impingement) and chemical (bursitis) factors could be a source for the noxious stimuli inducing increased amounts of substance P in the afferent nerves. The conclusion of his study was that the subacromial bursa was the site associated with shoulder pain caused by rotator cuff disease.
We suggest to pay special attention to patients with persistent pain due to chronic CT. This subpopulation requires periodical outpatient visit (every 4 months) to exclude stiffness and monitor the evolution of calcium deposit with ultrasound; in addition, radiograms should be performed annually to assess the morphology of the deposit and its relationship with the underneath bone. NSAIDs are recommended when the pain score is more than 5 on a Visual Analogic scale (0–10). A standard program of physiotherapy including self aided mobilization and home exercises are prescribed to prevent stiffness. ESWT may be advised to foster calcium resorption, while other physical therapies (Laser, Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation) may help to treat associated LHB tendinopathies.
In addition, we do believe that some of the other complications listed below could be an important source of chronic and resistant pain in CT.
Another interesting association of stiffness and CT is found in the post operative phase in arthroscopy. In a study by Jacobs et al.  the incidence of frozen shoulder after surgery was 18 % and the cause was considered to be the irritation of the glenohumeral capsule by residual calcium debris and hence thorough lavage was recommended to avoid such a possibility. Although he did not have literature evidence to support his claim, this assumption may not be entirely misplaced. In the section on pain previously described, one cause for it was considered to be stiffening due to voluntary prolonged immobilization. Conversely, the pain produced could further limit the compliance of the patient with respect to physiotherapy and rehabilitation thus producing a vicious cycle. Overall this association would usually lead to a prolonged recovery phase with regards to strength and motion.
Rotator cuff tears
Greater tuberosity osteolysis
The ideal treatment for the CT of the shoulder is not well established and for some aspects still controversial. The clinical course may be complicated by several conditions that should be diagnosed and treated when we manage a patient with CT of the RC. Whereas pain and stiffness are generally recognized and treated, the risk of RC tears ìs not well considered and the related surgical approach is a concern. Greater tuberosity osteolysis is less known and often not identified on radiograms or ultrasound, therefore, we would suggest to investigate with MRI in those patients with persistent chronic pain and doubtful standard X-ray. Finally, ossifying tendinitis is very rare and only recently reported as complication of CT that should be considered and investigated with X-ray in subjects with CT already treated with conservative or operative measures. We do believe that this review gives a quick summary of the potential complications of the CT, inviting all professionals (orthopaedic surgeons, physiatrists, radiologists and physiotherapists) who deal with this disease to consider not only the regular course of the CT but also the complications that must be identified and treated as well as possible.
Conflict of interest
The patients represented in this study provided informed consent to the publication of their clinical cases.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
- Balke M, Bielefeld R, Schmidt C, Dedy N, Liem D (2012) Calcifying tendinitis of the shoulder: midterm results after arthroscopic treatment. Am J Sports Med 40(3):657–661. doi:10.1177/0363546511430202PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cho NS, Lee BG, Rhee YG (2010) Radiologic course of the calcific deposits in calcific tendinitis of the shoulder: does the initial radiologic aspect affect the final results? J Shoulder Elb Surg 19:267–272. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2009.07.008View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- DePalma AF, Kruper JS (1961) Long term study of shoulder joints afflicted with and treated for calcific tendinitis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 20:61–72Google Scholar
- Lippmann RK (1961) Observations concerning the calcific cuff deposit. Clin Orthop Relat Res 20:49–60Google Scholar
- Rowe CR (1985) Calcific tendinitis. Instr Course Lect 34:196–198PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Merolla G, Dave AC, Paladini P, Campi F, Porcellini G (2014) Ossifying tendinitis of the rotator cuff after arthroscopic excision of calcium deposits: two case reports and literature review. J Orthop Traumatol 15 [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
- Bosworth B (1941) Calcium deposits in the shoulder and subacromial bursitis: a survey of 12122 shoulders. JAMA 116:2477–2482View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- El Shewy MT (2011) Arthroscopic removal of calcium deposits of the rotator cuff: a 7-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 39(6):1302–1305. doi:10.1177/0363546510396320PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Codman EA (1906) On stiff and painful shoulders. Boston Med Surg J 154:613–620View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Moseley HF, Goldie I (1963) The arterial pattern of the rotator cuff of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Br 45:780–789PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Uhthoff HK, Loehr JW (1997) Calcific tendinopathy of the rotator cuff: pathogenesis, diagnosis and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 5:183–191PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Plenk HP (1952) Calcifying tendinitis of the shoulder. Radiology 59:384–389PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Re LP, Karzel RP (1993) Management of rotator cuff calcifications. Orthop Clin North Am 24:125–132PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Friedman MS (1957) Calcified tendinitis of the shoulder. Am J Surg 94(1):56–61PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pfister J, Gerber H (1997) Chronic calcifying tendinitis of the shoulder-therapy by percutaneous needle aspiration and lavage: a prospective open study of 62 shoulders. Clin Rheumatol 16(3):269–274PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lee KS, Rosas HG (2010) Musculoskeletal ultrasound: how to treat calcific tendinitis of the rotator cuff by ultrasound-guided single-needle lavage technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195(3):638. doi:10.2214/AJR.10.4878PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Serafini G, Sconfienza LM, Lacelli F, Silvestri E, Aliprandi A, Sardanelli F (2009) Rotator cuff calcific tendonitis: short-term and 10-year outcomes after two-needle US-guided percutaneous treatment. Nonrandomized controlled trial. Radiology 252(1):157–164. doi:10.1148/radiol.2521081816PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sabeti-Aschraf M, Dorotka R, Goll A, Trieb K (2005) Extracorporeal shock wave therapy in the treatment of calcific tendinitis of the rotator cuff. Am J Sports Med 33:1365–1368PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Loew M, Daecke W, Kusnierczak D, Rahmanzadeh M, Ewerbeck V (1999) Shock wave therapy is effective for chronic calcifying tendonitis of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81:863–867PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Loew M, Jurgowski W, Mau HC, Thomsen M (1995) Treatment of calcifying tendinitis of rotator cuff by extracorporeal shock waves: a preliminary report. J Shoulder Elb Surg 4:101–106View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rompe JD, Zoellner JZ, Nafe B (2001) Shock wave therapy versus conventional surgery in treatment of the calcifying tendonitis of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 387:72–82PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Porcellini G, Paladini P, Campi F, Paganelli M (2004) Arthroscopic treatment of calcifying tendinitis of the shoulder: clinical and ultrasonographic follow-up findings at two to five years. J Shoulder Elb Surg 13:503–508View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- McLaughlin HL (1963) The selection of calcium deposit for operation: the technique and results of operation. Surg Clin North Am 43:1501–1504PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ark JW, Flock TJ, Flatow EL, Bigliani LU (1992) Arthroscopic treatment of calcific tendonitis of the shoulder. Arthroscopy 8:183–188PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ellman H (1987) Arthroscopic subacromial decompression: analysis of one to three year results. Arthroscopy 3:173–181PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Uhthoff HK, Sarkar K, Maynard JA (1976) Calcifying tendinits: a new concept of its pathogenesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 118:164–168PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Oliva F, Via AG, Maffulli N (2012) Physiopathology of intratendinous calcific deposition. BMC Med 10:95. doi:10.1186/1741-7015-10-95PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hamada J, Tamai K, Ono W, Saotome K (2006) Does the nature of deposited basic calcium phosphate crystals determine clinical course in calcific periarthritis of the shoulder? J Rheumathol 33:326–332Google Scholar
- Penel G, Leroy G, Rey C, Bres E (1998) MicroRaman spectral study of the PO4 and CO3 vibrational modes in synthetic and biological apatites. Calcif Tissue Int 63:475–481PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chiou HJ, Hung SC, Lin SY, Wei YS, Li MJ (2010) Correlations among mineral components, progressive calcification process and clinical symptoms of calcific tendonitis. Rheumatology 49:548–555. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kep359PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Archer R, Bayley J, Archer C, Ali S (1993) Cell and matrix changes associated with pathological calcification of the human rotator cuff tendons. J Anat 182:1–12PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gohr CM, Fahey M, Rosenthal AK (2007) Calcific tendonitis: a model. Connect Tissue Res 48:286–291PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gartner J, Heyer A (1995) Calcific tendinitis of the shoulder. Orthopade 24(3):284–302PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gartner J, Simons B (1990) Analysis of calcific deposits in calcifying tendinitis. Clin Orthop 254:111–120PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mole´ D, Kempf JF, Gleyze P, Rio B, Bonnomet F, Walch G (1993) Results of endoscopic treatment of non-broken tendinopathies of the rotator cuff. Calcifications of the rotator cuff [in French]. Rev Chir Orthop 79:532–541PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Maier M, Schmidt-ramsin J, Glaser C, Kunz A, Küchenhoff H, Tischer T (2008) Intra- and interobserver reliability of classification scores in calcific tendinitis using plain radiographs and CT scans. Acta Orthop Belg 74:590–595PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gosens T, Hofstee DJ (2009) Calcifying tendinitis of the shoulder: advances in imaging and management. Curr Rheumatol Rep 11(2):129–134PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Le Goff B, Berthelot JM, Guillot P, Glémarec J, Maugars Y (2010) Assessment of calcific tendonitis of rotator cuff by ultrasonography: comparison between symptomatic and asymptomatic shoulders. Joint Bone Spine 77:258–263. doi:10.1016/j.jbspin.2010.01.012PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Martinoli C, Bianchi S, Prato N, Pugliese F, Zamorani MP, Valle M, Derchi LE (2003) US of the shoulder: non-rotator cuff disorders. RadioGraphics 23:381–401PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chiou HJ, Chou YH, Wu JJ, Hsu CC, Huang DY, Chang CY (2002) Evaluation of calcific tendonitis of the rotator cuff—role of color doppler ultrasonography. J Ultrasound Med 21:289–295PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Monteleone G, Tramontana A, Mc Donald K, Sorge R, Tiloca A, Foti C (2014) J Sports Med Phys Fitness 27 [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
- Flemming DJ, Murphey MD, Shekitka KM, Temple HT, Jelinek JJ, Kransdorf MJ (2003) Osseous involvement in calcific tendinitis: a retrospective review of 50 cases. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181:965–972PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bayam L, Ahmad MA, Naqui SZ, Chouhan A, Funk L (2011) Pain mapping for common shoulder disorders. Am J Orthop 40(7):353–358PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Spivey JL, Carrell TM (2009) Severe pain in the shoulder with no history of trauma. Calcific tendinitis. JAAPA 22(4):59–60PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hurt G, Baker CL Jr (2003) Calcific tendinitis of the shoulder. Orthop Clin North Am 34:567–575PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Neer CS II (1990) Less frequent procedures. In: Neer CS II (ed) Shoulder reconstruction. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 421–485Google Scholar
- Gotoh M, Hamada K, Yamakawa H, Inoue A, Fukuda H (1998) Increased substance P in subacromial bursa and shoulder pain in rotator cuff diseases. J Orthop Res 16(5):618–621PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen SK, Chou PH, Lue YJ, Lu YM (2008) Treatment for frozen shoulder combined with calcific tendinitis of the supraspinatus. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 24:78–84. doi:10.1016/S1607-551X(08)70101-3PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Anton HA (1993) Frozen shoulder. Can Fam Physician 39:1773–1778PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cutts S, Clarke D (2002) The patient with frozen shoulder. Practitioner 246:730, 734–736,738–739Google Scholar
- Harryman DT 2nd (1993) Shoulders: frozen and stiff. Instr Course Lect 42:247–257PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Neviaser TJ (1987) Adhesive capsulitis. Orthop Clin North Am 18:439–443PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Minter WT III (1967) The shoulder-hand syndrome in coronary disease. J Med Assoc Ga 56(2):45–49PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wohlgethan JR (1987) Frozen shoulder in hyperthyroidism. Arthritis Rheum 30(8):936–939PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cheville AL, Tchou J (2007) Barriers to rehabilitation following surgery for primary breast cancer. J Surg Oncol 95(5):409–418PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bowman CA, Jeffcoate WJ, Pattrick M, Doherty M (1988) Bilateral adhesive capsulitis, oligoarthritis and proximal myopathy as presentation of hypothyroidism. Br J Rheumatol 27(1):62–64PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ogilvie-Harris DJ, Myerthall S (1997) The diabetic frozen shoulder: arthroscopic release. Arthroscopy 13(1):1–8PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Arkkila PE, Kantola IM, Viikari JS, Rönnemaa T (1996) Shoulder capsulitis in type I and II diabetic patients: association with diabetic complications and related diseases. Ann Rheum Dis 55(12):907–914PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rokito AS, Loebenberg MI (1999) Frozen shoulder and calcific tendonitis. Curr Opin Orthop 10:294–304View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Neviaser RJ (1983) Painful conditions affecting the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 173:63–69PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Noel E (1997) Treatment of calcific tendinitis and adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder. Rev Rhum Engl Ed 64:619–628PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jacobs R, Debeer P (2006) Calcifying tendinitis of the rotator cuff: functional outcome after arthroscopic treatment. Acta Orthop Belg 72:276–281PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mclaughlin HL, Asherman EG (1951) Lesions of the musculotendinous cuff of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am 33:76–86PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kernwein GA (1965) Roentgenographic diagnosis of shoulder dysfunction. JAMA 194:1081–1085PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wolfgang GL (1974) Surgical repair of tears of the rotator cuff of the shoulders: factors influencing the result. J Bone Joint Surg Am 56:14–26PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hsu HC, Wu JJ, Jim YF, Chang CY, Lo WH, Yang DJ (1994) Calcific tendinitis and rotator cuff tearing: a clinical and radiographic study. J Shoulder Elb Surg 3:759–764. doi:10.1016/S1058-2746(09)80095-5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gotoh M, Higuchi F, Suzuki R, Yamanaka K (2003) Progression from calcifying tendinitis to rotator cuff tear. Skelet Radiol 32(2):86–89View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jerosch J, Strauss JM, Schmiel S (1998) Arthroscopic treatment of calcific tendinitis of the shoulder. J Shoulder Elb Surg 7:30–37View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yoo Jh, Park WH, Koh KH, Kim SM (2010) Arthroscopic treatment of chronic calcific tendinitis with complete removal and rotator cuff tendon repair. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:1694–1699. doi:10.1007/s00167-010-1067-7PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kayser R, Hampf S, Seeber E, Heyde CE (2007) Value of preoperative ultrasound marking of calcium deposits in patients who require surgical treatment of calcific tendinitis of the shoulder. Arthroscopy 23:43–50PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ozkoc G, Akpinar S, Hersekli MA, Ozalay M, Tandogan RN (2002) Arthroscopic treatment of rotator cuff calcifying tendinitis. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 36:413–416PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Seil R, Litzenburger H, Kohn D, Rupp S (2006) Arthroscopic treatment of chronically painful calcifying tendinitis of the supraspinatus tendon. Arthroscopy 22:521–527PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Maier D, Balke M, Jaeger M, Izadpanah K, Suedkamp NP, Ogon P, Liem D (2012) Arthroscopic treatment of calcific tendinitis of the shoulder: Letter to the Editor. Am J Sports Med 40(7): NP12-13. doi:10.1177/0363546512453459
- Chan R, Kim DH, Millett PJ, Weissman BN (2004) Calcifying tendinitis of the rotator cuff with cortical bone erosion. Skelet Radiol 33:596–599View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Porcellini G, Paladini P, Campi F, Pegreffi F (2009) Osteolytic lesion of greater tuberosity in calcific tendinitis of the shoulder. J Shoulder Elb Surg 18:210–215. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2008.09.016View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ozaki J, Kugai A, Tomita Y, Tamai S (1992) Tear of an ossified rotator cuff of the shoulder. A case report. Acta Orthop Scand 63:339–340PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar