- Case Report
- Open Access
Supraspinatus rupture at the musculotendinous junction in a young woman
© The Author(s) 2013
- Received: 7 May 2013
- Accepted: 24 September 2013
- Published: 30 November 2013
The vast majority of rotator cuff tears occur within the tendon or as an avulsion from the greater tuberosity. Supraspinatus injury at the musculotendinous junction is a very uncommon event. We describe a case of supraspinatus rupture at the musculotendinous junction, with successful conservative treatment. It occurred in a 23-year-old woman, the youngest patient with this uncommon type of injury. To our knowledge, this is the first case of rupture of the supraspinatus muscle at the musculotendinous junction in a young woman and the second in a woman.
- Rotator Cuff
- Constant Score
- Sarcomere Length
- Great Tuberosity
- Pennation Angle
Rotator cuff tears are very common injuries; ruptures generally occur within the tendon or as an avulsion from the greater tuberosity [1, 2]. Musculotendinous ruptures are common both in the upper and in the lower extremities; ruptures of the rotator cuff through the musculotendinous junction are exceptional . We describe a case of traumatic supraspinatus rupture at the musculotendinous junction in a 23-year-old woman, its clinical presentation, and the successful conservative treatment performed.
At day 80, the strength of the supraspinatus was restored to normal, SST score was 12, and Constant score was 100. She was able to perform all activities without limitations. MRI performed 29 months after the trauma showed no edema and a restored intramuscular tendinous septum, but a hypotrophic muscle with a grade 1 fatty infiltration according to Fuchs was visible (Fig. 3). At that time, the patient was healthy, without limitation in her activities, and maintained an SST score of 12 and a Constant score of 100.
To our knowledge, in the peer-reviewed literature there are only six cases of a traumatic rupture of the supraspinatus at the musculotendinous junction [4, 5]. Our patient is the youngest reported with a rupture of the supraspinatus at the musculotendinous junction. Mean age of the six previously reported cases is 40 years ; anyway lower than the mean 55 years old found for a supraspinatus tendon tear or the mean 49 years old found for a musculotendinous rupture of the infraspinatus [2, 6]. Musculotendinous injuries are common in the extremities but rare in the rotator cuff; musculotendinous lesions of the supraspinatus are exceptional . Grade 3 injuries are complete rupture of the muscle fibers and generally occur at the musculotendinous junction. The acute phase of such lesions is characterized by widespread intra- and extramuscular edema and hematoma and complete disruption of the muscle; these lesions heal with scar formation and generally muscle weakness . Rupture of the musculotendinous junction may occur at different strain rates according to muscle architecture and elongation.
The main role of the rotator cuff is to stabilize the glenohumeral joint. Consequently, their fibers are designed for force production rather than excursion: they are short and produce near-maximal active tension over a narrow range of sarcomere length. Glenohumeral stability must be provided also with the muscles at rest or in extreme joint position; for this reason, muscle fibers have long resting sarcomere lengths to produce adequate passive tension . The combination of short fibers and long resting sarcomere length make the rotator cuff muscles relatively sensitive to stretch because of the low rate of myofilament overlap . Pennate muscle, such as the infraspinatus, are more susceptible to such injury; for muscles with similar pennation angles but with differing fiber lengths, imposing a given stretch across the muscle will lengthen each sarcomere in a short fiber to a greater extent compared with those in a long fiber . This finding is in agreement with the fact that musculotendinous rupture of the infraspinatus, a pennate muscle, is a recognized injury when rupture of the supraspinatus, a parallel-fibered muscle, is rare; it remains to be understood .
In our case, the indirect traumatic etiology is clear; the mechanism producing the lesion is debatable. Supraspinatus rupture at the musculotendinous junction could have been caused by a sudden passive stretching of the supraspinatus because of the position of the arm during the fall. When the arm is forced backward and adducted, the supraspinatus fibers are already maximally lengthened and passively stretched, so myofilament overlap is too low to permit muscle contraction. It is well known that reflex muscle contraction is a defense mechanism to prevent or reduce the amount of damage caused by a given injury. Therefore, muscles that are actively contracting, particularly if eccentric, can resist to a greater force before musculotendinous unit failure than can passively stretched muscles. Another explanation for the rupture may be an acute inlet impingement at the acromioclavicular joint during the fall with the arm outstretched and forced backward. The shape of the patient’s acromion, type 2 according to Bigliani, could support this mechanism, but absence of acromioclavicular osteoarthritis could make this mechanism unlikely.
Due to the unique case reported here, we are unable to recommend a treatment strategy for this type of lesion. In our case, conservative treatment showed a satisfactory outcome, leading to complete restoration of supraspinatus function in 80 days and an asymptomatic grade 1 fatty degeneration of the muscle belly on MRI after 29 months. This is in contrast with the previous study in which conservative treatment of full-thickness lesion led to the patient’s dissatisfaction and grade 4 fatty infiltration on MRI follow-up .
Conflict of interest
We, the authors, declare no conflict of interest.
The patient gave informed consent to the publication of this case report.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
- Tashjian RZ (2012) Epidemiology, natural history, and indications for treatment of rotator cuff tears. Clin Sports Med 31(4):589–604. doi:10.1016/j.csm.2012.07.001PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liem D, Lichtengerg S, Magosh P, Habermeyer P (2007) Magnetic resonance imaging of arthroscopic supraspinatus tendon repair. J Bone Joint Surg 89(8):1770–1776. doi:10.2106/JBJS.F.00749PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fuchs S, Chylarecki C, Langenbrinck A (1999) Incidence and symptoms of clinically manifest rotator cuff lesions. Int J Sports Med 20:201–205PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hertel R, Lambert SM (1998) Supraspinatus rupture at the musculotendinous junction. J Should Elb Surg 7:432–435View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lädermann A, Christophe FK, Denard PJ, Walch G (2012) Supraspinatus rupture at the musclotendinous junction: an uncommonly recognized phenomenon. J Should Elb Surg 21(1):72–76. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2011.01.038View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Walch G, Nové-Josserand L, Liotard JP, Noel E (2009) Musculotendinous infraspinatus ruptures: an overview. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 95:463–470. doi:10.1016/j.otsr.2009.06.004PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ward SR, Hentzen ER, Smallwood LH, Eastlack RK, Burns KA, Fithian DC, Friden J, Lieber RL (2006) Rotator cuff muscle architecture: implications for glenohumeral stability. Clin Orthop Relat Res 448:157–163PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Howell SM, Imobersteg AM, Seger DH, Marone PJ (1986) Clarification of the role of the supraspinatus muscle in shoulder function. J Bone Joint Surg Am 68:398–404PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gordon AM, Huxley AF, Julian FJ (1966) The variation in isometric tension with sarcomere length in vertebrate muscle fibres. J Physiol 184:143–169PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Garrett WE Jr, Nikolaou PK, Ribbeck BM, Glisson RR, Seaber AV (1988) The effect of muscle architecture on the biomechanical failure properties of skeletal muscle under passive extension. Am J Sports Med 16(1):7–12View ArticleGoogle Scholar