Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a direct anterior approach versus the standard lateral approach: perioperative findings
© The Author(s) 2012
Received: 10 October 2011
Accepted: 13 March 2012
Published: 5 April 2012
1. The authors have not stated whether all the replacements were cemented, uncemented, or both, as minimally invasive surgery is more suited for uncemented .
2. The authors have also overlooked the difference in rehabilitation time after surgery or analgesic requirements between the two groups.
It would be helpful if the authors elaborated on the above-mentioned concerns.
Conflict of interest
There is no conflict of interest for this work.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
- Alecci V, Valente M, Crucil M, Minerva M, Pellegrino C-M et al (2011) Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a direct anterior approach versus the standard lateral approach: perioperative findings. J Orthop Traumat 12:123–129View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Breusch SJ, Malchau H (2005) The well-cemented total hip arthroplasty—theory and practice, 1 edn. Springer Medizin Verlag, Berlin, 1–15Google Scholar