- Case Report
- Open Access
Minimally invasive posterior stabilization for treating spinal tuberculosis
© The Author(s) 2012
- Received: 16 December 2010
- Accepted: 31 January 2012
- Published: 23 February 2012
We describe a case of dorsal–lumbar vertebral tuberculosis (Pott’s disease) first treated with antibiotic therapy, bed rest, and cast. After 2 months of treatment patient’s symptoms worsened. Minimally invasive posterior vertebral stabilization was carried out, with excellent clinic and radiographic results.
- Spinal tuberculosis
- Minimally invasive stabilization
Surgical treatment of pyogenic and tubercular (TB) continues to evolve, thanks to minimally invasive techniques . Standard indications to surgery are one or a combination of the following pathological settings: severe bone loss, progressively enlarging abscess, failure of conservative treatment, severe instability and/or deformity, or progressive neurologic deficit. A mainstay of orthopedic science has always been to avoid metallic implant positioning in an infected area. This case supports the safety of instrumentation in patients affected by pyogenic and TB vertebral osteomyelitis and its importance in the healing process by stabilizing the affected levels. The common trend is to widen the surgical indication  to achieve greater stability after extensive debridement of the infected area. In this context, a new treatment concept is to consider selected cases of spondylodiscitis as pathological fractures that need stabilization. The aim of this treatment is to create the best environment in which to allow antibiotics to work and heal the infection, making the new bone formation easier and filling the bone loss. We present a patient affected by Pott’s disease of T11–L1 treated successfully with antitubercular drugs and percutaneous sinal stabilization.
The goals of spondylitic TB treatment are care of the infection with adequate anti-TB drugs and care of the altered biomechanics of the functional segment involved (vertebra and intervertebral disc) through stabilization of the spine. Partial or complete resolution of pain and neurological deficits is the consequence of correct treatment. A multidisciplinary approach to these diseases is mandatory. We believe that antibiotic therapy is the appropriate initial treatment to cure the infection. However, spinal stabilization is another method for suppressing spinal infections and preventing serious imbalance in kyphosis that can cause severe neurological impairment , especially after injury to the thoracic spine. In that case, the sagittal weight-bearing axis is anterior to the center of the vertebral bodies and produces progressive kyphotic deformation . Stabilization of a bony lesion is a well-known and important factor in the healing process of infections, creating the optimal environment for antibiotics to exert their effect in the area. The use of metallic implants in an infected area of the spine is safe and does not lead to persistence or recurrence of infection if associated with correct antimicrobial therapy . Several techniques describe using an anterior and posterior approach in patients with no neurologic disorder, and percutaneous internal fixation is useful as a minimally invasive approach to reduce immobilization and recovery time in fragile patients . Our patient had a good response to drug therapy but nonetheless displayed increasing weakness, fatigue, and weight loss. Only after restored spinal stability did his response to antibiotic therapy improve, with improvement in pain and functional activities, which prevented neurological deficits. Comparison of follow-up imaging showed correction stability and healing of diseased tissue, along with new bone apposition. Minimally invasive techniques preserve muscle tissue and obtain spinal stabilization with minimal blood loss, thereby allowing a rapid recovery, which is essential in vulnerable patients. A single case cannot demonstrate the effectiveness and safety of a surgical technique, so only with clinical trials will it be possible to draw ultimate conclusions.
Conflict of interest
The patient gave the informed consent prior being included into the study; this study is authorized by the local ethical committee and was performed in accordance with the Ethical standards of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki as revised in 2000.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
- Chen WH, Jiang LS, Dai LY (2007) Surgical treatment of pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis with spinal instrumentation. Eur Spine J 16:1307–1316PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Oguz E, Sehilioglu A, Altinmakas M, Ozturk C (2008) A new classification and guide for surgical treatment of spinal tuberculosis. Int Orthop (SICOT) 32:127–133View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bhojraj S, Nene A (2002) Lumbar and lumbosacral tuberculous spondylodiscitis in adults. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84-B:530–534View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Blondel B, Fuentes S, Metellus P, Adetchessi T, Dufour H (2009) Percutaneous internal fixation in the management of lumbar spondylitis: report of two cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 95:220–223PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ito M, Sudo H, Abumi K, Kotani Y, Takahata M, Fujita M, Minami A (2009) Minimally invasive surgical treatment for tuberculous spondylodiscitis. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 52(5–6):250–253PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar