Established non-union of an operatively managed trans-scaphoid perilunate fracture dislocation progressing to spontaneous union
© The Author(s) 2011
Received: 1 November 2010
Accepted: 9 June 2011
Published: 30 June 2011
Perilunate dislocations and fracture dislocations represent uncommon and unusual injuries that are often missed at initial presentation and diagnosed late in up to 25% of cases. Prompt open reduction, carpal stabilisation and ligamentous repair is required to reduce the risk of complications. We report a case of an established scaphoid non-union in an operatively managed perilunate fracture dislocation that spontaneously united almost 2 years after the initial injury, just before a planned revision scaphoid fixation with bone grafting. This case highlights the importance of initial clinical assessment together with appropriate radiographs and follow-up of these injuries post-operatively, especially when complications such as non-union arise.
KeywordsTrans-scaphoid perilunate fracture dislocation Non-union Spontaneous union
Perilunate fracture dislocations represent uncommon and unusual injuries that are often missed at initial presentation in up to 25% of cases . A neglected injury of this type can result in progressive carpal instability with ensuing post-traumatic arthritis, leading to pain and dysfunction . Prompt open reduction, carpal stabilisation and ligamentous repair is required to reduce the risk of complications.
We report a case of an established scaphoid non-union in an operatively managed perilunate fracture dislocation that spontaneously united almost 2 years after the initial injury, just before a planned revision scaphoid fixation with bone grafting. To our knowledge, and following an extensive literature search of the PubMed and MEDLINE databases, such a case has not been reported on before.
Stability of the carpal bones is dependent on the perilunar ligaments and the scaphoid bone, which acts as a bony bridge between the proximal and distal carpal rows. Malgaigne was the first to describe the perilunate fracture dislocation, in 1855. These are uncommon injuries and represent 10% of all carpal injuries . Lesser arc injuries are purely ligamentous and result in perilunar injury, with lunar dislocation being the last stage. Transosseous variants are classified as greater arc injuries and represent two-thirds of perilunar dislocations. They result in perilunar injury with fractures of the scaphoid, capitate, radial/ulnar styloid or triquetrum, or combinations thereof. The trans-scaphoid perilunate variant is reported to represent 61% of all perilunate fracture dislocations .
The general mechanism of injury results from hyperextension with ulnar deviation and intercarpal supination, as described by Mayfield et al.  in 1980. They suggested four stages of ligamentous disruption, progressing in a radial to ulnar direction, with volar lunate dislocation (into the space of Poirier) being the final stage.
Although prompt surgical intervention can potentially avoid progressive carpal instability, it has been reported that over 50% of operatively managed patients can develop post-traumatic arthritis . Closed reduction alone is associated with poor outcome in 27% of cases due to difficulties in attaining and maintaining anatomic reduction . Prompt open reduction, carpal stabilisation and ligamentous repair is the treatment of choice to prevent this.
Theoretically, the risk of scaphoid non-union would be higher in the setting of perilunate fracture dislocation due to increased soft tissue damage at time of injury and increased carpal instability thereafter. In a series of 15 operatively managed trans-scaphoid perilunate fracture dislocations, 13 were fixed with Herbert screws. Three developed non-union and required further bone grafting . In another series, 25 trans-scaphoid perilunate fracture dislocations were operatively managed and no non-unions developed at a mean of 44.6 months . More recently, Forli et al.  reported retrospectively on a series that included seven trans-scaphoid perilunate fracture dislocations managed operatively with a minimum 10 years follow-up. Three out of seven had excellent or good Mayo wrist score, and four out of seven had radiographical evidence of degenerative changes at follow-up. They only encountered one scaphoid non-union. The authors re-enforce that poor reduction in these injuries leads to worse degenerative changes, however this did not always correlate with wrist function.
There have been no reports of spontaneous unions of scaphoid fractures in established non-union following operative fixation in the setting of perilunate fracture dislocation. We are aware of three case reports of established isolated scaphoid non-unions that have spontaneously united, one in a 19-year-old requiring fixation  and the other two in paediatric cases. Clarke et al.  report on an 11-year-old and Manak et al.  report on a 14-year-old, both with established scaphoid non-unions that proceeded to union at 2 years post injury.
The important messages that the presented case highlights are as follows. Firstly, perilunate injuries are difficult to diagnose and emergency department doctors should be aware of these injuries. A history of high-energy injury with axial loading of an extended wrist should raise suspicion of a perilunar injury. Full clinical evaluation of the wrist and upper limb, including neurological examination, together with appropriate good-quality X-rays is essential.
Secondly, the importance of pre-operative clinical and radiological re-assessment cannot be stressed enough. This is important to prevent possible morbidity associated with unnecessary procedures. In this case, the patient’s clinical symptoms were significant enough to warrant surgical intervention. However, this needed to address the radial-sided impingement as the scaphoid had spontaneously united.
Finally, regular follow-up of these injuries is important for monitoring of rehabilitation and checking for possible complications.
The authors acknowledge Mr. Calum Cree (SpR Trauma & Orthopaedics) for digital imaging of the X-rays printed with this case report.
Conflict of interest
The patient gave informed consent prior to being included in this case report.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
- Herzberg G et al (1993) Perilunate dislocations and fracture dislocations. A multicentre study. J Hand Surg 18:768–779View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dobyns JJ, Linscheid RL (1975) Carpal injuries. In Rockwood CA, Green DP (eds) Fractures, 2nd edn. Lippincott, p 451Google Scholar
- Mayfield JK, Johnson RP, Kilcoyne RK (1980) Carpal dislocations: pathomechanics and progressive perilunar instability. J Hand Surg 5A:226–241View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Adkison JW, Chapman MW (1982) Treatment of acute lunate and perilunate dislocations. Clin Orthop 164:199–207PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hee HT, Wong HP, Low YP (1999) Trans-scaphoid perilunate fracture/dislocations—results of surgical treatment. Ann Acad Med Singapore 28:791–794PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Knoll V, Allan C, Trumble T (2005) Trans-scaphoid perilunate fracture dislocations: results of screw fixation of the scaphoid and lunotriquetral repair with a dorsal approach. J Hand Surg 30(6):1145.e1–1145.e11Google Scholar
- Forli A et al (2010) Perilunate dislocations and transscaphoid perilunate fracture-dislocations: a retrospective study with minimum ten-year follow-up. J Hand Surg 35A:62–68View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Roolker W, Ritt MJPF, Bos KE (1998) Spontaneous healing of a non-union of the scaphoid. J Hand Surg 23(1):86–87View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Clarke JV, Ramjug SD, Barnes SJ (2006) Established scaphoid non-union progressing to spontaneous union in a child. Injury Extra 37:170–171View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Manak P, Pavel D, Paucek B (2008) Spontaneous consolidation of scaphoid non-union in a child. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub 152(2):271–273PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar