Open Access

Pes cavus and hereditary neuropathies: when a relationship should be suspected

  • S. Piazza1,
  • G. Ricci1,
  • E. Caldarazzo Ienco1,
  • C. Carlesi1,
  • L. Volpi1,
  • G. Siciliano1 and
  • M. Mancuso1Email author
Journal of Orthopaedics and TraumatologyOfficial Journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology201011:114

DOI: 10.1007/s10195-010-0114-y

Received: 7 May 2010

Accepted: 25 September 2010

Published: 21 October 2010

Abstract

The hereditary peripheral neuropathies are a clinically and genetically heterogeneous group of diseases of the peripheral nervous system. Foot deformities, including the common pes cavus, but also hammer toes and twisting of the ankle, are frequently present in patients with hereditary peripheral neuropathy, and often represent one of the first signs of the disease. Pes cavus in hereditary peripheral neuropathies is caused by imbalance between the intrinsic muscles of the foot and the muscles of the leg. Accurate clinical evaluation in patients with pes cavus is necessary to exclude or confirm the presence of peripheral neuropathy. Hereditary peripheral neuropathies should be suspected in those cases with bilateral foot deformities, in the presence of family history for pes cavus and/or gait impairment, and in the presence of neurological symptoms or signs, such as distal muscle hypotrophy of limbs. Herein, we review the hereditary peripheral neuropathies in which pes cavus plays a key role as a “spy sign,” discussing the clinical and molecular features of these disorders to highlight the importance of pes cavus as a helpful clinical sign in these rare diseases.

Keywords

Pes cavus Hereditary peripheral neuropathy Neurological evaluation Multidisciplinary management

Introduction

Pes cavus is a foot deformity characterized by a high arch of the foot that does not flatten with weight bearing; the deformity can be located in the forefoot, midfoot, hindfoot, or in a combination of all these sites (Figs. 1, 2). Pes cavus is a common finding in the general population, with prevalence of approximately 10% [1].
Fig. 1

Pes cavus and main en griffe in a patient with CMT1A

Fig. 2

Pes cavus in a patient with CMT1A

Frequently, pes cavus may be a sign of an underlying neurological disorder, including spinal cord and peripheral nerve pathologies, such us spino-cerebellar ataxia and hereditary peripheral neuropathies. A previous retrospective analysis of patients undergoing pes cavus surgery [2] revealed that almost one-third of apparently idiopathic cases suffered from a neurological disease.

Herein, we discuss the hereditary peripheral neuropathies (HPN) in which pes cavus plays a key role as a “spy sign.” A clear, complete, and detailed review of clinical and molecular features of these rare disorders may be useful in clinical management and differential diagnosis of patients who present with pes cavus as almost single sign of disease.

Hereditary peripheral neuropathies (HPN) are a heterogeneous group of peripheral nerve disorders, clinically characterized by sensorial and/or motor impairment, with reduction or absence of deep tendon reflexes [3].

Foot deformities, including pes cavus, hammer toes, and twisting of the ankle, are commonly present in some HPN forms, such as Charcot–Marie–Tooth (CMT) disease, hereditary neuropathy with predisposition to pressure palsies (HNPP), and distal hereditary motor neuropathy (DHMN) [4], but are uncommon in the other HPN. We will therefore discuss only the clinical features and genetic basis of HPN associated with pes cavus.

HPN associated with pes cavus

Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease

The most common form of HPN is hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy (HMSN), also called Charcot–Marie–Tooth (CMT) disease. Prevalence is estimated at about 17–40 per 100,000 [5].

CMT is a genetically heterogeneous disorder (Table 1), classified into demyelinating (CMT1 and CMT4), axonal (CMT2 and CMT4), and intermediate (CMT, CMTX, CMT2E) forms, and caused by mutations in several genes coding for structural myelin proteins, gap-junction proteins, cytoskeleton components, enzymes, or transcription factor. CMT is usually transmitted as an autosomal dominant trait, although rarer X-linked (CMTX) or recessive forms have been reported [6, 7]. CMT is a slow progressive disease, usually with onset in the second or third decade. Rarely, CMT arises in early infancy (Dejerine–Sottas and congenital hypomyelination diseases) [8] with a severe phenotype characterized by hypotonia and delay in motor milestones. CMT onset may also occur later, generally with a less aggressive clinical course [9].
Table 1

Genetic classification of hereditary motor and sensory neuropathies

 

Gene

Inheritance

Locus

HMSN1-CMT1

 CMT1A:

PMP-22

Dominant/sporadic

17p11

 CMT1B:

P0 protein

Dominant

lq22

 CMT1C:

LITAF

Dominant

16pl3

 CMT1D:

EGR2

Dominant

10q21

 CMT1E:

P0 protein

Dominant

lq22

 CMT1F:

Neurofilament light chain

Dominant/sporadic

8p21

HMSN2-CMT2

 CMT2A1:

KIF1B

Dominant

lp36

 CMT2A2:

MFN2

Dominant

lp36

 CMT2B:

RAB7

Dominant

3ql3-q22

 CMT2C:

TRPV4

Dominant

12q23-q24

 CMT2D:

GARS

Dominant

7pl5

 CMT2E:

Neurofilament light chain

Dominant

8p21

 CMT2F:

HSPB1

Dominant/recessive

7q11-q21

 CMT2G:

 

Dominant

12ql2

 CMT2I:

PO

Dominant

lq22

 CMT2J:

PO

Dominant

lq22

 CMT2L:

HSPBE

Dominant

12q24

 AR-CMT2A

Lam in A/C

Recessive

lq21.2

 AR-CMT2E

Med25

Recessive

19ql3.3

 CMT2K:

GDAP1

Dominant/recessive

8q21

HMSN3—DSN/CHN

 DSNA

PMP-22

Dominant/recessive

17p11-2

 DSNB

MP2

Dominant/recessive

lq22

 DSNC

EGRP2

Dominant

10q21/EGR2

 DSND

 

Dominant

Sq23-24

 DSN

PRX

Recessive

19ql3.1-13.2

 DSN

GDAP1

Recessive

8ql3-21.1

Congenital hypomyelination

 CHA

PMO-22

Dominant

17p11.2

 CHB

MP2

Dominant

lq22

 CHC

EGRP2

Dominant/recessive

10q21

HMSN4-CMT4

 CMT4A:

GDAP1

Recessive

8q21

 CMT4B1:

MTMR2

Recessive

11q23

 CMT4B2:

SBF2

Recessive

11p15

 CMT4C:

SH3TC2 (KLAA1985)

Recessive

5q32

 CMT4D:

NDRG1

Recessive

8q24

 CMT4E:

EGR2

Dominant/recessive

10q21

 CMT4F:

Periaxin

Recessive

19ql3

 CMT4H:

FGD4

Recessive

12ql2

 CMT4J

FIG4

Recessive

6q21

HSMN5

 Silver syndrome

Seipin/BSCL2

Dominant

11ql3

 Troyer syndrome

SPG20

Recessive

13ql2.3

Hereditary motor and sensor neuropathy (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/omim)

The most common features in classical CMT phenotype are skeletal deformities such as pes cavus with hammer toes; less frequent skeletal signs are pes planus, twisting of ankle and tripping, and painful foot callosities. Scoliosis could be present in 10% of affected people [10, 11]. Neurological examination shows characteristic signs of a sensorimotor peripheral neuropathy. Sensory signs are usually less prominent (70%) than motor ones [12]. The most frequent findings [13] are ataxia, hypoesthesia, and loss of vibration, two-point discrimination, and joint position sense. Motor impairment, which usually became evident during the course of disease, is responsible for upper and lower limb weakness and atrophy, with main en griffe (Fig. 1) and “inverted champagne bottle” legs. Steppage gait and foot drop are the first most common motor signs. Deep tendon reflexes are diminished or absent [14]. Muscle cramps, cold feet, acrocyanosis, and postural tremor are frequent complaints.

Electroneurography allows classification of CMT disease into two main forms: CMT1 or demyelinating form, characterized by a marked slowing in nerve conduction velocities (by definition, <38 m/s in upper limb motor nerves) and by a primary myelinopathy; and CMT2 or axonal form, in which nerve conduction values are preserved or only mildly slowed (>38 m/s in upper limb motor nerves) and the axon is the primary disease target [15]. The existence of a CMT subgroup showing nerve conduction velocity (NCV) values “intermediate” between CMT1 and CMT2 has been also reported [16, 17].

As previously reported, CMT diagnosis is based on clinical examination, electrophysiological findings, and molecular testing. In selective cases, such as in patients with sporadic form or in whom molecular investigations result unable to demonstrate DNA defects, nerve biopsy might give relevant information for diagnosis and differential diagnosis. In particular, the typical histological marker of demyelinating neuropathies is represented by the presence of basal lamina “onion bulbs,” determined by concentric proliferation of Shawn cell cytoplasmic processes during the demyelination phenomenon and the remyelination tentative. In the advanced phase, loss of normal myelin covering (“nude axon”) has also been reported. Large-caliber fiber reduction and formation of isolated monostratified “simple onion bulbs” have been described in CMT2 [3].

There are no pharmacologic cures for CMT. A well-balanced diet and weight control can help minimize disability. Dietary supplements such as creatine, and co-enzyme Q have not been proven effective in treating CMT. Aerobic exercise and rehabilitation play an essential role in preserving quality of life of patients with CMT. A small percentage of patients with inherited neuropathy may respond to immunomodulatory therapy, such as prednisone or intravenous gammaglobulin (IVIG). Potentially neurotoxic medications, such as vincristine or cisplatinum, should be avoided [18]. Experimental studies showed that progesterone antagonist improves neuropathy in CMT1A rats, and it represents a promising pharmacologic target for CMT1A patients [19, 20].

Dejerine–Sottas neuropathy and congenital hypomyelinating neuropathy

Dejerine–Sottas (DSN) and congenital hypomyelinating (CHN) neuropathies are rare, severe, infantile-onset, demyelinating peripheral nerve diseases.

DSN is transmitted as an autosomal dominant or recessive trait (Table 1). Clinical onset occurs at up to 2 years of age, with motor and sensory impairment and skeletal deformities, more frequently represented by scoliosis. NCV of DSN patients is greatly compromised, with values <15 m/s. Sural nerve biopsies could show marked demyelination or predominant axonal loss [8, 18].

CHN, an autosomal dominant or recessive disease (Table 1), is characterized by severe hypotonia (“floppy infant”), dysphagia, and respiratory insufficiency, usually occurring within the first year of life. NCV is very slow (<10 m/s), and sural nerve biopsy presents pathological features similar to those of DSN [16, 17].

Hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies

The prevalence of hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies (HNPP) is estimated to be at least 16 per 100,000 [21].

HNPP is an autosomal dominant disorder due to a deletion in chromosome 17p11.2 which codes for peripheral myelin protein (PMP22), an integral membrane protein that is a major component of myelin in the peripheral nervous system [22].

Patients present acute and transient episodes of focal neuropathies, commonly affecting the ulnar, radial, and peroneal nerves and the brachial plexus. These episodes are typically painless, recurrent, and occur after trauma or pressure, or with no evident precipitating factor [23]. The palsies may be debilitating, last for days to weeks, and require installation of specific orthosis. Onset of HNPP is usually in adolescence, with a high degree of penetrance; however, clinically asymptomatic gene carriers are reported. Neurological examination could evidence hypoactive deep tendon reflexes and mild pes cavus, even in clinically asymptomatic patients [24].

With ageing, these patients can have a significant clinical overlap with CMT1, as the repeated injuries to the nerve can prevent full reversal.

Electrophysiological examination shows prolonged motor and sensory nerve conduction velocities (NCV) [25] and conduction blocks that are characteristic of the affected nerves, especially over entrapment sites. NCV abnormalities are also present in those nerves apparently unaffected by palsy and in asymptomatic gene carriers [26].

Histological analysis of sural nerve biopsies shows segmental area of de- and remyelination. The pathological hallmark of HNPP is presence of tomacula, consisting of massive variable myelin overfolding [27]. In rare of HNPP patients nerve biopsy could be present only the axonal regeneration signs [28].

There is no specific treatment for HNPP. Current management consists of early detection and diagnosis of the disease, to reduce excessive force or repetitive movements, or to avoid static joint positions. Chemotherapeutic agents, such as vincristine, should be used with great caution [29].

Distal hereditary motor neuropathies

Distal hereditary motor neuropathies (dHMNs) are very rare genetic disorders (approximately prevalence rate of 1/100,000) [30], inherited as an autosomal dominant, autosomal recessive or X-linked trait [3133] (Table 2).
Table 2

Genetic classification of distal hereditary motor neuropathies

Type

Inheritance

Gene/locus

HMN I

AD

Unknown

HMN II

AD

HSP27 (HSPB1)

HMN II

AD

HSP22 (HSPB8)

HMN III

AR

11q13

HMN IV

AR

11q13

HMN V

AD

GARS

HMN V

AD

BSC12

HMN VI

AR

IGHMBP2

HMN VIIA

AD

2q14

HMN VIIB

AD

DCTN1

HMN/ALS4

AD

SETX

HMN-J

AR

9p21.1-p12

Congenital distal SMA

AD

12q23-12q24

Distal hereditary motor neuropathies (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/omim)

dHMN usually presents as a classical peroneal muscular atrophy syndrome without sensory symptoms [34]. The clinical picture consists of progressive weakness and wasting of the extensor muscles of the toes and feet. Later, weakness and wasting also involve the distal upper limb muscles. Foot deformity is a common feature. Additional features are represented by involvement of hands, vocal cord paralysis, diaphragm paralysis, and pyramidal tract signs [35].

In dHMN patients, electromyography evidences signs of chronic denervation, and motor NCV study shows an amplitude reduction of compound muscle action potentials or a moderate decrease in velocity. Sensory nerve conductions and amplitudes were normal [4, 36].

Sural nerve biopsy has rarely been performed in dHMN patients and usually showed normal findings [4]. Muscle biopsy shows neurogenic damage related to lower motor neuron degeneration [37].

dHMN has no specific treatment. Patients need neurological follow-up to evaluate the disease’s clinical progression and for referral to rehabilitation or orthopedic service for correct management of complications.

Etiopathogenesis of pes cavus in HPN

Pes cavus in HPN derives from plantar flexion deformity of the first metatarsal due to imbalance between the intrinsic muscles of the foot and the muscles of the leg. The exact physiopathological mechanisms responsible for pes cavus genesis in HPN is not entirely clarified, even if two main hypotheses have been formulated [38].

The first hypothesis assigns an important role in the pathogenesis of this skeletal deformity to overaction of the peronei in comparison with the antagonist tibialis anterior, secondary to the leg muscle’s amyotrophy pattern in the disease. In particular, it has been supposed that a weak peroneus brevis is overpowered by a relatively stronger tibialis posterior, causing adduction of the forefoot and inversion of the hindfoot. In addition, a weak tibialis anterior is overpowered by a stronger peroneus longus, causing plantar-flexion of the first metatarsal and anterior pes cavus [12, 3941]. The intrinsic foot muscles develop contractures, while the long extensor to the toe muscles, recruited to assist in ankle dorsiflexion, causes claw toes deformity.

The second hypothesis is that precocious and primary involvement of intrinsic foot muscles is responsible for the pathogenesis of pes cavus, because the deformity is observed in the early stages of the disease, also when there is not yet evidence of leg muscle weakness [42]. A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study of amyotrophic leg and foot muscles performed in patients with CMT [43] reported precocious fatty infiltration of intrinsic foot muscles, also when leg muscles are still preserved. The authors deduced that the weakness of the lumbricals and the other intrinsic foot muscles, due to selective denervation, could cause the dorsiflexion of metatarsophalangeal joints, initially responsible for the flattening of the transverse arcus plantaris and the clawing of the toes. Dorsiflexion of metatarsophalangeal joints during gait could also determine the wrapping around the metatarsal head of the plantar aponeurosis and the contraction of the short flexors, with secondary shortening of the Achilles tendon and limitation of ankle dorsiflexion. A subsequent MRI muscle study in CMT patients also seems to confirm a possible primary role of intrinsic foot muscle in pes cavus pathogenesis [44]. The sensitivity of MRI for detecting precocious denervation changes in early stages of HMN and CMT has been also recently confirmed [45].

In conclusion, the foot deformity pes cavus, secondary to plantar flexion deformity of the first metatarsal, could be associated to several neurological disorders, including spinal cord and peripheral nerve pathologies, such us spino-cerebellar ataxia and hereditary peripheral neuropathies.

In this article, we have reported the HPN in which pes cavus plays a key role as a “spy sign” [46, 47], as a precocious manifestation of HPN. Accurate clinical evaluation in patients with pes cavus is therefore necessary to exclude or confirm the presence of contemporary involvement of peripheral nerves [48, 49], especially in the early stage of the disease, when other signs of HPN may not yet be present or evident.

When should HPN be suspected in a patient with pes cavus? Clinical data suggestive of HPN are represented by evidence of: bilateral pes cavus, positive family history for pes cavus and/or gait impairment, distal muscle hypotrophy of limbs, and sensorial and/or motor dysfunction.

When one or more of these signs are present, the patient should be subjected to neurological evaluation to complete the HPN diagnostic algorithm, based on electroneurographysiological studies and, subsequently, molecular analysis (see Fig. 3).
Fig. 3

When pes cavus might reveal HPN: a proposed diagnostic algorithm. NCS nerve conduction studies, HPN hereditary peripheral neuropathies

Declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Neuroscience, Neurological Clinic, University of Pisa

References

  1. Japas LM (1968) Surgical treatment of pes cavus by tarsal v-osteotomy: preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 50:927–944PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Brewerton DA, Sandifer PH, Sweetnam DR (1963) Idiopathic pes cavus: an investigation into its aetiology. Br Med J 14:659–661View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Pareyson D, Marchesi C (2009) Diagnosis, natural history, and management of Charco-Marie-Tooth disease. Lancet Neurol 8:654–667PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Irobi J, Dierick I, Jordanova A, Claeys KG, De Jonghe P, Timmerman V (2006) Unraveling the genetics of distal hereditary motor neuronopathies. Neuromolecular Med 8:131–146PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Martyn CN, Hughes RAC (1997) Epidemiology of peripheral neuropathy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 62:310–318PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Boerkoel CF, Takashima H, Lupski JR (2002) The genetic convergence of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease types 1 and 2 and the role of genetics in sporadic neuropathy. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2:70–77PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Pareyson D, Testa D, Morbin M, Erbetta A, Ciano C, Lauria G, Milani M, Taroni F (2003) Does CMT1A homozygosity cause more severe disease with root hypertrophy and higher CSF proteins? Neurology 60:1721–1722PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Chance PF, Lupski JR (1994) Inherited neuropathies: Charcot Marie Tooth disease and related disorders. Baillieres Clin Neurol 3:373–385PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Shy ME, Jani A, Krajewski K, Grandis M, Lewis RA, Li J, Shy RR, Balsamo J, Lilien J, Garbern JY, Kamholz J (2004) Phenotypic clustering in MPZ mutations. Brain 127:371–384PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Holmes JR, Hansen ST (1993) Foot and ankle manifestations of Charcot Marie Tooth disease. Foot Ankle 14:476–486PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Banchs I, Casasnovas C, Albertí A, De Jorge L, Povedano M, Montero J, Martínez-Matos JA, Volpini V (2009) Diagnosis of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. J Biomed Biotechnol 2009:985415PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Shy ME, Lupski JR, Chance PF, Klein CJ, Dyck PJ (2005) Hereditary motor and sensory neuropathies: an overview of clinical, genetic, electrophysiologic, and pathologic features. In: Dyck PJ, Thomas PK (eds) Peripheral neuropathy, 4th edn. Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 1623–1658View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Szigeti K, Lupski JR (2009) Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Eur J Hum Genet 17:703–710PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Mann RA, Missirian J (1988) Pathophysiology of Charcot Marie Tooth disease. Clin Orthop 234:221–228PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Harding AE, Thomas PK (1980) The clinical features of hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy (types I and II). Brain 103:259–280PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Birouk N, LeGuern E, Maisonobe T, Rouger H, Gouider R, Tardieu S, Gugenheim M, Routon MC, Léger JM, Agid Y, Brice A, Bouche P (1998) X linked Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease with connexin 32 mutations: clinical and electrophysiologic study. Neurology 50:1074–1082PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Züchner S, Noureddine M, Kennerson M, Verhoeven K, Claeys K, De Jonghe P, Merory J, Oliveira SA, Speer MC, Stenger JE, Walizada G, Zhu D, Pericak-Vance MA, Nicholson G, Timmerman V, Vance JM (2005) Mutations in the pleckstrin homology domain of dynamin 2 cause dominant intermediate Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Nature Genet 37:289–294PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Grandis M, Shy ME (2005) Current therapy for Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Curr Treat Options Neurol 7:23–31PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Sereda MW, Meyerzu Hörste G, Suter U, Uzma N, Nave KA (2003) Therapeutic administration of progesterone antagonist in a model of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT1A). Nat Med 9:1533–1537PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Koenig HL, Schumacher M, Ferzaz B, Thi AN, Ressouches A, Guennoun R, Jung-Testas I, Robel P, Akwa Y, Baulieu EE (1995) Progesterone synthesis and myelin formation by Schwann cells. Science 268:1500–1503PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Meretoja P, Silander K, Kalimo H, Aula P, Meretoja A, Savontaus ML (1997) Epidemiology of hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies (HNPP) in south western Finland. Neuromuscul Disord 7:529–532PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Snipes GJ, Suter U, Welcher AA, Shooter EM (1992) Characterization of a novel peripheral nervous system myelin protein (PMP-22/SR13). J Cell Biol 117:225–238PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Pareyson D, Taroni F (1996) Deletion of the PMP22 gene and hereditary liability to pressure palsies. Curr Opin Neurol 9:348–354PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Chance PF (1999) Overview of hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies. Ann N Y Acad Sci 14(883):14–21View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Earl CJ, Fullerton PM, Wakefield GS, Schutta HS (1964) Hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies. Q J Med 33:481–498PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Mouton P, Tardieu S, Gouider R, Birouk N, Maisonobe T, Dubourg O, Brice A, LeGuern E, Bouche P (1999) Spectrum of clinical and electrophysiological features in HNPP patients with the 17p11.2 deletion. Neurology 52:1440–1446PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Madrid R, Bradley WG (1975) The pathology of neuropathies with focal thickening of the myelin sheath (tomaculous neuropathy): studies on the formation of the abnormal myelin sheath. J Neurol Sci 25:415–448View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Sessa M, Nemni R, Quattrini A, Del Carro U, Wrabetz L, Canal N (1997) Atypical hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies (HNPP): the value of direct DNA diagnosis. J Med Genet 34:889–892PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Kalfakis N, Panas M, Karadima G, Floroskufi P, Kokolakis N, Vassilopoulos D (2002) Hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies emerging during vincristine treatment. Neurology 59:1470–1471PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Radhakrishnan K, Thacker AK, Maloo JC (1988) A clinical, epidemiological and genetic study of hereditary motor neuropathies in Benghazi, Libya. J Neurol 235:422–424PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Nelson JN, Amick LD (1966) Heredofamilial progressive spinal muscular atrophy: a clinical and electromyographic study of a kinship. Neurology 16:306Google Scholar
  32. Emery AEH (1971) Review: the nosology of the spinal muscular atrophies. J Med Genet 8:481–495PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Takata RI, Martins CES, Passosbueno MR, Abe KT, Nishimura AL, Da Silva MD, Monteiro A Jr, Lima MI, Kok F, Zatz M (2004) A new locus for recessive distal spinal muscular atrophy at Xq13.1–q21. J Med Genet 41:224–229PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Harding AE (1993) In: Dyck PJ, Thomas PK, Griffin JW, Low PA, Poduslo JF (eds) Peripheral Neuropathy. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 1051–1064Google Scholar
  35. Irobi J, De Jonghe P, Timmerman V (2004) Molecular genetics of distal hereditary motor neuropathies. Hum Mol Genet 1:195–202View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Frequin ST, Gabreels FJ, Gabreels-Festen AA, Joosten EM (1991) Sensory axonopathy in hereditary distal spinal muscular atrophy. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 93:323–326PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Timmerman V, Raeymaekers P, Nelis E, De Jonghe P, Muylle L, Ceuterick C, Martin JJ, Van Broeckhoven C (1992) Linkage analysis of distal hereditary motor neuropathy type II (distal HMN II) in a single pedigree. J Neurol Sci 109:41–48PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Burns J, Ouvrier R (2006) Pes cavus pathogenesis in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A. Brain 129:E50; author reply E51Google Scholar
  39. Tynan MC, Klenerman L, Helliwell TR, Edwards RH, Hayward M (1992) Investigation of muscle imbalance in the leg in symptomatic forefoot pes cavus: a multi disciplinary study. Foot Ankle 13:489–501PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Guyton GP, Mann RA (2000) The pathogenesis and surgical management of foot deformity in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Foot Ankle Clin 5:317–326PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Berciano J, García A, Combarros O (2003) Initial semeiology in children with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease 1A duplication. Muscle Nerve 27:34–39PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Sabir M, Lyttle D (1983) Pathogenesis of pes cavus in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Clin Orthop Relat Res 175:173–178PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Gallardo E, García A, Combarros O, Berciano J (2006) Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A duplication: spectrum of clinical and magnetic resonance imaging features in leg and foot muscles. Brain 129:426–437PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Chung KW, Suh BC, Shy ME, Cho SY, Yoo JH, Park SW, Moon H, Park KD, Choi KG, Kim S, Kim SB, Shim DS, Kim SM, Sunwoo IN, Choi BO (2008) Different clinical and magnetic resonance imaging features between Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A and 2A. Neuromuscul Disord 18:610–618PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Del Porto LA, Nicholson GA, Ketheswaren P (2010) Correlation between muscle atrophy on MRI and manual strength testing in hereditary neuropathies. J Clin Neurosci 2010 Apr 15 Apr 15 Epub ahead of printGoogle Scholar
  46. Carter GT, England JD, Chance PF (2004) Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease: electrophysiology, molecular genetics and clinical management. IDrugs 7:151–159PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Pareyson D, Scaioli V, Laura M (2006) Clinical and electrophysiological aspects of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Neuromolecular Med 8:3–22Google Scholar
  48. Berciano J, Gallardo E, García A, Infante J, Mateo I, Combarros O (2006) Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A duplication with severe paresis of the proximal lower limb muscles: a long-term follow-up study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 77:1169–1176PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Reilly MM, Shy ME (2009) Diagnosis and new treatments in genetic neuropathies. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 80:1304–1314PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2010