Official Journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Study | Patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) mean (range/SD) | Range of motion (ROM) forearm-pronation supination | OR time (mean minutes) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Weißer 2003 [29] | DASH 11.3 | NR | 67 | |||||||
Gao 2005 [24] | DASH 19 (4–72) | P 62 S 80 | 78 | |||||||
Weckbach 2006 [25] | DASH 13.7 | NR | 67 | |||||||
Visńa 2008 [30] | Anderson score: full ROM 89%, restricted 11% | P 62 S 80 | 75 | |||||||
Lee 2008 [6] | DASH 15 (5–61) | GES EX (22, 81%) GD (3, 11%) AC (2, 7%) | P 85 (82–89) S 87 (83–90) | 45 | ||||||
Ozkaya 2009 [31] | DASH ORIF: 15 (4–30) IMN: 13 (3–25) | GES ORIF: EX (14, 63%), GD (4, 18%), AC (4, 18%) IMN: EX (16, 80%), GD (2, 10%), AC (2, 10%) | NR | 65 | ||||||
Bansal 2011 [32] | DASH: 14 (8–36) | GE: EX (11, 87%) GD (1, 12%) | 11 full ROM/1 limited ROM | 35 | ||||||
Behnke 2012 [12] | GE: ORIF EX (18, 66%) GD (2, 7.4%), AC (5, 18.5%), P (2, 7.4%) hybrid EX (17, 58%) GD (5, 17%), AC (6, 20%), P (1, 3%) | ORIF: P 82.2 ± 16.5 (30–90) S 78.5 ± 22.2 (10–90) hybrid: P 84.5 ± 13.2 (30–90) S 79.1 ± 20.2 (20–90) | NR | |||||||
Lil 2012 [33] | DASH: 15 (4–36) | GE: EX (17, 50%) GD (10, 29%) AC (4, 11%) P (3, 9%) | NR | 42 | ||||||
Saka 2013 [34] | DASH: 8.08 (0–17.5) | GE: EX (15, 83%), GD (2, 11%), P (1, 5%) | P 80 (70–90) S 82 (80–90) | NR | ||||||
Lee 2014 [15] | DASH: ORIF: 15 ± 3 IMN: 18 ± 3 | GE: ORIF: EX (19, 86%), GD (2, 9%), P (1, 4%) IMN: EX (21, 84%), GD (3, 12%), AC (1, 4%) | ORIF PS arc 159 (154–164) IMN PS arc 157 (151–163) | ORIF: 74 ± 8 IMN: 52 ± 10 | ||||||
Saka 2014 [35] | DASH: 4.2 (0–13.3) | GE: EX or GD (21, 91%) AC (2, 9%) | P 84 S 82 | 20 (15–32) | ||||||
Saka 2014 [26] | DASH: 6.5 (0–13.3) | GE: EX (38, 88%), GD (5, 12%) | P 80 S 82 | 30 (23–45) | ||||||
Köse 2014 [36] | DASH: 15.15 (4–38.8) | P 83 S 73 | 61.94 | |||||||
Kim 2015 [13] | DASH: ORIF: 7.1 hybrid: 15.1 | ORIF: P 79 (50–90) S 85 (70–90) hybrid: P 73 (60–90) S 76 (50–90) | NR | |||||||
Zhang 2016 [10] | Anderson’s scoring system: ORIF: EX (11, 52.4%) GD (3, 14.3%) P (7, 33.3%) IMN: EX (11, 50%) GD (5, 22.7%) P (6, 27%) hybrid: EX (34, 77%) GD (5, 11%) P (5, 11%) | ORIF: 137 IMN: 77 Hybrid: 68 | ||||||||
Al-Sadek 2016 [37] | Anderson’s scoring system: ORIF: EX (20, 87%) GD (3, 13%) IMN: Ex (15, 68%) GD (3, 13.9%) P (4, 18%) | NR | ||||||||
Köse 2016 [38] | DASH 12.58 (3.3–32.5) | GE All Ex, 1 GD | P 85 (74–90) S 75 (67–80) | 27.5 (17–70) | ||||||
Babu 2017 [39] | NR | NR | NR | |||||||
Kose 2017 [17] | DASH: ORIF 9.81 (3.3–30) IMN 12.87 (3.3–38.8) | GE IMN EX (40, 83%), GD (8, 16%) ORIF EX (36, 85%), GD (4, 9%), AC (1, 2%), P (1, 2%) | IMN P 84 (74–90) S 75 (65–80) | ORIF P 84 (64–90) S 74 (65–80) | ORIF: 63 IMN: 46 | |||||
Azboy 2017 [20] | Dash 14 (5–36) | GE: EX (21, 65%), GD (7, 22%), AC (3, 9%), P (1, 3%) | 52 | |||||||
Yörükoğlu 2017 [28] | DASH 31.2 ± 24.9 | P 72.2 ± 19.8 S 75.3 ± 24.7 | NR | |||||||
Kibar 2019 [16] | DASH ORIF: 7.7 ± 8.6 IMN: 7 ± 4.5 | GE: ORIF: EX (24, 80.0%), GD (2, 6.7%), AC (4, 13.3%) IMN: EX (19, 70.4%), GD (7, 25.9%), AC (1,3.7%) | ORIF: S 81.7 ± 5.9° P 81.7 ± 6.5 | IMN: S 82.6 ± 4.5° P 80.7 ± 8.3° | ORIF: 63 IMN 46 | |||||
Lee 2019 [40] | DASH: ORIF: 15 ± 3 IMN: 18 ± 3 hybrid: 16 ± 4 | GE: ORIF: EX (35, 85.3%) GD (4, 9.7%) AC (2, 4.9%) IMN: EX (23, 82.1%) GD (3, 10.7%) AC (2, 7.1%) Hybrid: EX (27, 84.4%) GD (3, 9.4%) AC (2, 6.2%) | Pronation-supination arc ORIF: 161 ± 5 IMN: 156 ± 6 hybrid: 160 ± 2 | ORIF: 74 IMN: 59 Hybrid: 68 | ||||||
Kibar 2020 [14] | DASH: ORIF: 6.56 ± 9.9 IMN: 4.42 ± 3.96 | GE: ORIF: EX (13, 59.1%) GD (5, 22.7%) AC (4, 18.2%) IMN: EX (21, 77.8%) GD (4, 14.8%) AC (2, 7.4%) | ORIF: P 83.41 ± 5.21 S 81.59 ± 5.21 IMN: P 84.81 ± 4.27 S 83.04 ± 4.66 | IMN 21 (15–35) ORIF 46 (40–110) | ||||||
Uygur 2021 [41] | Dash: 10.5 (0–56) | GE: EX/GD (75, 96%), P (3, 4%) | NR | NR | ||||||
Pavone 2021 [11] | GE: EX (22, 73%) GD (4, 13%) AC (2, 7%) P (2, 7%) | P 75 (50–80) S 68 (50–80) | NR | |||||||
Kale 2021 [19] | NR | 3 Patients: 30 °C P–S impairment compared with CLS | NR | |||||||
Blažević 2021 [18] | DASH ORIF (5.21 ± 2.21) IMN (4.68 ± 1.66) | NR | NR | |||||||
Aggregate mean values | DASH ORIF: 10.17 ± 3.98 IMN: 13.1 ± 6.04 Hybrid: 15.5 ± 0.63 | GE ORIF EX (190, 76%) GD (29, 11.6%) AC (21, 8.4%) P (10, 4%) | GE IMN EX (377, 70.7%) GD (115, 21.5%) AC (21, 3.9%) P (20, 3.75%) | GE hybrid EX (78, 74.2%) GD (13, 12.3%) AC (8, 7.6%) P (6, 5.7%) | IMN pronation: 78.3 ± 7.89 Supination: 73 ± 4.99 | ORIF pronation 82.15 ± 1.93 Supination 79.7 ± 4.47 | Hybrid pronation 78.78 ± 5.75 Supination 77.55 ± 1.55 | Surgical time ORIF 65.3 ± 28.7 IMN: 50.8 ± 17.7 Hybrid 68 |