Skip to main content

Official Journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology

Table 1 Main data from the study

From: Capacitive biophysical stimulation improves the healing of vertebral fragility fractures: a prospective multicentre randomized controlled trial

 

Control group

CCEF group

p value

Patients, n (VFFs)

33 (VFFs = 34)

33 (VFFs = 35)

Gender

   

 Male, n (%)

4 (12.12%)

5 (15.15%)

0.65

Age

   

 Mean ± SD

72.88 ± 6.09

73.6 ± 7.82

0.768

 Range

65–84

64–83

BMI (kg/m2)

   

 Mean ± SD

26.055 ± 3.9

26.735 ± 4.35

0.722

Smoking status

   

 N of smokers (%)

10 (30.3%)

10 (30.3%)

Vertebral fracture type (OF classification)

   

 OF 1, n (%)

1 (2.94%)

2 (5.7%)

0.03*

 OF 2, n (%)

33 (97.06%)

33 (94.3%)

0.07

Vertebral fracture site

   

 T10, n (%)

3 (8.82%)

3 (8.57%)

0.83

 T11, n (%)

4 (11.76%)

3 (8.57%)

0.83

 T12, n (%)

9 (26.47%)

10 (28.6%)

0.21

 L1, n (%)

10 (29.42%)

11 (31.4%)

0.11

 L2, n (%)

5 (14.71%)

5 (14.29%)

0.88

 L3, n (%)

3 (8.82%)

3 (8.57%)

0.83

Adverse reactions to CCEF

   

 N (%)

0

N/A

Patient compliance

   

 Adherence (%)

94%

N/A

Oedema resolution per hour of CCEF therapy (mm2/h)

   

 ΔE (mean ± SD)

0.95 ± 0.47

N/A

  1. N/A not available
  2. *p < 0.005 (chi-square test)