Skip to main content

Official Journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology

Table 3 Details of final follow-up assessment including clinical, functional scores and radiographic outcomes

From: Direct anterior approach with conventional instruments versus robotic posterolateral approach in elective total hip replacement for primary osteoarthritis: a case–control study

 

DAA group

R-PL group

p-Value

Leg length discrepancy (mm)

0.4 ± 1.4 (range: − 2 to 3)

0.6 ± 1.4 (range: − 2 to 5)

0.572

Harris hip score (points)

79.1 ± 19.0 (range: 28–91)

81.6 ± 17.4 (range: 1–91)

0.558

Forgotten joint score (points)

4.7 ± 8.9 (range: 0–12)

5.7 ± 10.1 (range: 0–48)

0.629

Cup inclination (degrees)

45.1 ± 6.1 (range: 22–58)

43.0 ± 3.9 (range: 34–52)

0.069

Cup malalignment

2 (4.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0.141

Stem appropriate size

49 (98.0%)

48 (96.0%)

1.000

Stem malalignment

1 (2.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0.485

  1. Continuous variables are expressed with main values, standard deviation and range of values (under parenthesis)
  2. Absolute values are expressed by frequencies and relative percentages (under parenthesis)