Official Journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Table 6 Comparison between patients in group II according to whether a femoral osteotomy was performed or not
Femoral osteotomy (n = 25) | No femoral osteotomy (n = 11) | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|
Clinical outcomes | |||
LLD (mm)a | 3.4 ± 4.72 (0–15) | 2.27 ± 4.1 (0–10) | 0.56 |
Modified Severin gradeb | 0.47 | ||
Grade I | 15 (60%) | 5 (45.4%) | |
Grade II | 6 (24%) | 3 (27.3%) | |
Grade III | 3 (12%) | 3 (27.3%) | |
Grade IV | 1 (4%) | 0 | |
Radiological outcomes | |||
AIa | 27.34 ± 4.68 (19.7–36) | 28.22 ± 4.52 (21–36) | 0.78 |
Severin radiological gradeb | 0.66 | ||
Grade I | 13 (52%) | 5 (45.4%) | |
Grade II | 9 (36%) | 3 (27.3%) | |
Grade III | 0 | 0 | |
Grade IV | 0 | 2(18.2%) | |
Grade V | 0 | 1 (9.1%) | |
Grade VI | 3 (12%) | 0 | |
Complicationsb | |||
Avascular necrosis | 3 (12%) | 1 (9.1%) | 0.79 |
Infection | 1 (4%) | 0 | 0.45 |
Shenton line disruption | 3 (12%) | 3 (27.3%) | 0.34 |