Skip to main content

Official Journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology

Table 5 Reported complications

From: Carbon-fibre plates for traumatic and (impending) pathological fracture fixation: Where do we stand? A systematic review

Trauma fracture fixation

Study

Study design

Level of evidence

Quality of evidence (GRADE)

Number of patients*

Age**

Gender

Anatomic region of the plate

Indication

Follow-up (in months)

Complications

Dey Hazra [30]

RCS

III

Moderate

65 (30 CF)

61

22/30 female

Proximal humerus

Proximal humeral fracture

32

Structural complication [CF (n = 1) versus titanium (n = 1)];

Soft tissue complication [CF (n = 2) versus titanium (n = 0)]; humeral head necrosis [CF (n = 0) versus titanium (n = 3)]

Katthagen [26]

PCS

III

Low

42 (21 CF)

67

14 out of 21 female

Proximal humerus

Proximal humeral fracture

12

Soft tissue complications [CF (n = 4) versus titanium n = 0)]

Kimmeyer [31]

RCS

III

Low

98

66

74 out of 98 female

Proximal humerus

Proximal humeral fracture

28

Avascular necrosis (n = 12); head shaft malreduction (n = 12); soft tissue complications (n = 7); structural complications (n = 5); tuberosity malreduction (n = 5); malreduction of the fracture (n = 3); tuberosity resorption/dislocation (n = 2); secondary glenohumeral osteoarthritis (n = 2); infection (n = 1)

Padolino [27]

RCS

III

Low

42 (21 CF)

57

12 out of 21 female

Proximal humerus

Proximal humeral fracture

31

Structural complication [CF (n = 2) versus titanium (n = 0)]; humeral head necrosis [CF (n = 1) versus titanium (n = 1)]; tuberosity resorption [> 50%; CF (n = 3) versus titanium (n = 9)]; varus/valgus malalignment [CF (n = 2) versus titanium (n = 0)]

Rotini [16]

PCaS

III

Low

160

64

s1 19 out of 160 female

Proximal humerus

Proximal humeral fracture

24

Structural complication (n = 15); soft tissue complication (n = 39); humeral head necrosis (n = 13); reduction loss/tuberosity dislocation (n = 7); nonunion (n = 2)

Schliemann [28]

RCS

III

Low

58 (29 CF)

66

22 out of 29 female

Proximal humerus

Proximal humeral fracture

24

Humeral head necrosis [CF (n = 1) versus metal (n = 3)]; varus malalignment [CF (n = 4) versus metal (n = 7)]

Ziegler [29]

RCT

II

Moderate

63 (32 CF)

62

26 out of 32 female

Proximal humerus

Proximal humeral fracture

6

None

Allemann [32]

RCaS

IV

Low

10

53

4 out of 10 female

Distal radius

Distal radius fracture

12

None

Behrendt [33]

PCS

III

Low

26 (14 CF)

57

11 out of 14 female

Distal radius

Distal radius fracture

2

None

Berger-Groch [37]

RCT

II

Moderate

31 (16 CF)

59

10 out of 16 female

Distal radius

Distal radius fracture

36

Soft tissue complications [CF (n = 1) versus titanium (n = 2)]

Di Maggio [34]

RCaS

IV

Low

64

57

38 out of 64 female

Distal radius

Distal radius fracture

12

None

Paracuollo [35]

RCaS

IV

Low

40

62

22 out of 40 female

Distal radius

Distal radius fracture

12

None

Perugia [36]

RCT

II

Moderate

30 (15 CF)

57

10 out of 15 female

Distal radius

Distal radius fracture

16

None

Tarallo [10]

RCaS

IV

Low

110

58

77 out of 110 female

Distal radius

Distal radius fracture

48

Structural complication (n = 5); soft tissue complication (n = 3); infection (n = 1)

Guzzini [38]

PCaS

III

Low

22

51

14 out of 22 female

Distal radius

Distal radius fracture

12

Soft tissue complication (n = 1)

Baker [39]

RCaS

IV

Low

12

78

Not reported

Proximal femur

THA periprosthetic fracture

Not reported

Nonunion (n = 1)

Byun [40]

RCS

III

Low

31 (10 CF)

50

3 out of 10 female

Distal femur

Distal femur fracture

6

None

Mellon [41]

CR

IV

Very low

1

64

1 out of 1 female

Distal femur

Distal femur fracture

1

Structural complication (n = 1)

Mitchell [42]

RCS

III

Low

22 (11 CF)

72

8 out of 11 female

Distal femur

Distal femur fracture

12

Structural complications [CF (n = 0) versus stainless steel (n = 4)]; nonunion [CF (n = 1) versus stainless steel (n = 4)]

Caforio [43]

PCaS

IV

Low

27

57

13 out of 27 female

Distal fibula + distal tibia

Ankle fracture

4

Soft tissue complication (n = 1)

Guzzini [44]

PCS

III

Low

87 (47 CF)

57

32 out of 46 female

Distal fibula + distal tibia

Ankle fracture

24

Infection [CF (n = 3) versus stainless steel (n = 4)]

Pinter [45]

RCaS

IV

Low

30

47

18 out of 30 female

Distal fibula

Unstable lateral malleolus fracture

20

Soft tissue complication (n = 1); infection (n = 1); nonunion (n = 1)

(Impending) pathological fracture fixation

Laux [46]

CR

IV

Very low

2

77

2 out of 2 male

Humerus and tibia

Pathological fracture and prophylactic plate after curettage

6 and 8

None

Zoccali [50]

CR

IV

Very low

1

3

1 out of 1 female

Femur

Plate fixation after reconstruction

12

None

Yeung [49]

CR

IV

Very low

2

60

2 out of 2 female

Femur

Plate fixation after reconstruction

12 and 15

None

Rijs [47]

RCaS

IV

Low

96

43

59 out of 96 female

Femur (n = 67), tibia (n = 14), humerus (n = 13) and radius (n = 2)

(Impending) pathological fractures and plate fixation after reconstructions

35

Structural complication (n = 7); infection (n = 4); soft tissue complication (n = 1); tumour progression (n = 5); aseptic loosening (n = 1); nonunion (n = 2); angular deformation (n = 2)

Barnds [48]

CR

IV

Very low

1

9

1 out of 1 male

Tibia

Plate fixation after reconstruction

3

Structural complication (n = 1)

  1. THA total hip arthroplasty; CF = carbon-fibre; RCS = retrospective cohort study; RCaS = retrospective case study; PCS  prospective cohort study, PCaS  prospective case study, CR  case report(s), RCT  randomized controlled trial
  2. *Number of patients treated with carbon-fibre plates between brackets
  3. **Mean or median age (as reported in the study)