Skip to main content

Official Journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology

Table 3 Summary of findings

From: Suprapatellar vs infrapatellar approaches for intramedullary nailing of distal tibial fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Outcome

N

Participants (SP/IP)

Overall effect

Heterogeneity

MD/RR/SMD (95% CI)

P

I2 %

P

Pain level measured by VAS (12 months after surgery)

 All included studies

2

96/99

− 0.91 (− 3.21, 1.39)

0.44

98

 < 0.001

Lysholm score (12 months after surgery)

 All included studies

2

96/99

3.09 (0.83, 5.36)

0.007

0

0.83

AOFAS score (12 months after surgery)

 All included studies

2

96/99

8.25 (3.35, 13.15)

0.001

91

 < 0.001

Radiologic outcomes

 AP angulation (°)

3

275/248

− 2.09 (− 2.47, − 1.71)

 < 0.001

75

0.02

 LAT angulation (°)

3

275/248

− 1.40 (− 3.43, 0.64)

0.18

99

 < 0.001

 Malalignment

4

302/284

0.22 (0.06 to 0.75)

0.02

77

0.004

Surgical details

 Need for open reduction

3

228/233

0.58 (0.35, 0.97)

0.04

0

0.46

 Surgical time

2

96/99

− 15.15 (− 21.28, − 9.00)

 < 0.001

59

0.12

  1. AOFAS American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society, AP anteroposterior, IP infrapatellar nailing, LAT lateral, MD mean difference, RR risk ratio, SMD standardized mean difference, SP suprapatellar nailing