Skip to main content

Official Journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology

Table 1 Relevant anatomical data obtained at the time of dissection

From: Is an anteromedial minimally invasive approach for middle and distal third humeral fractures feasible? A cadaveric study and clinical case series

Measurement area

Specimen number/left (L) or right (R) side

No. 1 R

No. 2 R

No. 3 L

No. 4 L

No. 5 L

No. 6 R

No. 7 L

No. 8 R

No. 9 L

No. 10 L

No. 11 L

No. 12 R

No. 13 L

1. The distance from the medial condyle to the base of the coronal fossa (cm)

1.40

1.53

1.40

1.39

1.47

1.42

1.52

1.28

1.23

1.10

1.17

1.10

1.07

2. The vertical distance from the vertex of the medial epicondyle to the median nerve (cm)

3.1

3.0

3.3

3.2

3.0

3.4

3.1

2.9

2.9

2.6

2.9

2.8

2.3

3. The length of humerus (cm)

29.3

28.5

29.5

31.5

27.5

28.5

27.0

31.0

32.5

29.0

28.6

27.5

29.5

4. The distance from the medial epicondyle to the lateral epicondyle of the humerus (cm)

6.48

6.68

6.78

6.73

6.50

6.50

6.45

6.01

5.90

5.55

5.20

5.21

5.92

5. The distance from the vertex of the epicondyle to the intersection of the median nerve and the distal end of the underlying steel plate (cm)

6.8

6.4

6.2

6.5

6.3

5.7

6.7

6.4

6.2

6.9

6.1

5.8

5.7

6. The distance from the medial base of the humeral head to the intersection of the median nerve and the proximal end of the underlying steel plate. (cm)

9.2

9.8

9.0

10.6

8.8

8.6

7.0

9.2

10.1

8.6

8.5

7.6

8.5