Skip to main content

Official Journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology

Table 2 Group analysis for hip posterior fracture-dislocation receiving closed reduction at ED

From: A retrospective study of hip posterior fracture-dislocation: closed reduction at the emergency department or in the operation theater?

 

Reduction successful at bedside

Reduction failed at bedside

p value

Number

38

17

 

Age (mean + SD) years

36.18 (SD 15.44)

30.82 (SD 12.97)

0.19

Sex (%)

 Male

32 (84.2%)

14 (82.4%)

0.86

 Female

6 (15.8%)

3 (17.6%)

ISS (mean + SD)

12.03 (SD 6.00)

11.65 (SD 6.46)

0.84

NISS (mean + SD)

18.92 (SD 7.19)

19.76 (SD 6.57)

0.67

BMI (mean + SD)

26.73 (SD 4.99)

28.35 (SD 6.98)

0.48

Marginal impaction (%)

13(34.2%)

5(29.4%)

0.97

Associated femoral head fracture (%)

16 (42.1%)

7 (41.2%)

0.95

Posterior wall fragment size (%, mean + SD)

35.55 (SD 18.66)

28.70 (SD 21.27)

0.27

Time from injury to first close reduction attempt (h, mean + SD)

2.24 (SD 1.30)

4.11 (SD 1.80)

0.01

Time to reduction (h, mean + SD)

2.24 (SD 1.30)

7.31 (DS 3.94)

0.01

  1. Posterior wall fragment size was based on Moed’s method
  2. ISS injury severity score, NISS new injury severity score, BMI body mass index, ED emergency department, SD standard deviation