Skip to main content

Official Journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology

Table 3 Details of the included patients

From: Functional and radiological outcomes after treatment of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia using the Ilizarov technique: a retrospective single-center study

No./age (y)/sex

Side

Number of previous surgeries

Age at first surgery (y)

Type(s) of previous surgeries

Time from first surgery (y)

LLD (cm)

Preoperative bone defect (cm)

Intraoperative defect before shortening (cm)

CPT type

Preoperative AOFAS score

Index surgery (besides Ilizarov)

Additional surgeries

Duration of fixation (months)

1/5/M

Rt

2

3

Ilizarov

4

3

0.5

6

II

42

IM rod

Secondary BG

8

2/4.5/M

Rt

2

0.5

4.5

III

57

Exchange of wire

6

3/8/M

Rt

7

1.5

Ilizarov (n = 3)

BG (n = 2)

IM rod (n = 2)

6.5

9

3

8

II

57

IM rod

Exchange of wire

11

4/14.5/F

Rt

1

1

5.5

II

65

Secondary BG

8.5

5/3/M

Lt

1

1.5

Plate

1.5

4

2

5

II

48

Primary BG

Another BG then revision by 2 IM rods

7

6/5/M

Lt

1

3

IM rod

2

5

2

6

II

48

Primary BG

Exchange of wire and frame adjustment

8

7/4/F

Rt

3

1

6

I

44

IM rod

Secondary BG

8

8/6/M

Rt

1

5

Plate

1

4

2

8

II

48

IM rod

Secondary BG

11.5

9/7/F

Lt

3

3.5

Ilizarov (n = 1)

BG (n = 2)

3.5

6

4

7

II

42

IM rod

Secondary BG

10

10/5/M

Lt

1

4

Plate

1

4

0.5

5

III

57

Frame adjustment

9.5

11/3.5/M

Rt

2

0.5

6

I

44

IM rod

Secondary BG

8

12/3.5/F

Rt

2

0.5

6

I

42

IM rod

Secondary BG

8.5

13/4/M

Lt

3

1

7

I

42

IM rod

Secondary BG

9

14/5.5/M

Rt

4

1

7

I

38

IM rod

-

8.5

15/4.5/F

Lt

3

0.5

5

I

44

Secondary BG

8

16/4/M

Lt

3

1

6

I

42

Secondary BG

8.5

  1. CPT congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia; BG bone graft; IM intramedullary