Skip to main content

Official Journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology

Table 3 Outcomes in the nail group and plate group

From: Is double-crossed retrograde elastic stable intramedullary nailing an alternative method for the treatment of diaphyseal fractures in the adult humerus?

 

Overall (n = 122)

DCR-ESIN (n = 59)

LC-DCP (n = 63)

p-value

Timely union

116 (95.1%)

59 (100.0%)

57 (90.5%)

0.052

 Mean time to union, weeks

13.37 ± 3.19

12.00 ± 2.13

14.8 ± 3.49

 < 0.001

Delayed union

3 (2.5%)

0 (0%)

3 (4.8%)

 

 Mean time to delayed union, weeks

28.62 ± 0.59

28.62 ± 0.59

 

Nonunion

3 (2.5%)

0 (0%)

3 (4.8%)

 

Radiographic angulation

    

 AP angulation

4.77 ± 3.77

(0.23–21.75)

4.92 ± 4.10

(0.47–21.75)

4.62 ± 3.44

(0.23–15.04)

0.196

 Lat. angulation

5.42 ± 4.43

(0.17–25.48)

6.18 ± 5.35

(0.17–25.48)

4.66 ± 3.15

(0.49–13.59)

0.2759

Total complications

17 (12.3%)

3 (5.1%)

14 (22%)

0.006

 Radial nerve injury or impingement

3

0

3

0.049

 Implant related

4

1

3

0.129

 Infection

2

0

2

0.143

 Bone healing (delayed union or nonunion)

6 (4.9%)

0 (0%)

6 (9.5%)

0.027

DASH score at 1-year follow-up

8.03 ± 7.50

(0–45)

6.32 ± 3.6

(0–20)

9.63 ± 9.7

(0–45)

0.014

  1. DCR-ESIN double-crossed retrograde elastic stable intramedullary nailing, LC-DCP limited-contact dynamic compression plate, AP anterioposterior, Lat. lateral, DASH score the disability of the arm, shoulder and hand score