Skip to main content

Official Journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology

Table 2 Fracture patterns and locations

From: Is double-crossed retrograde elastic stable intramedullary nailing an alternative method for the treatment of diaphyseal fractures in the adult humerus?

 

Overall (n = 122)

DCR-ESIN (n = 59)

LC-DCP (n = 63)

p-value

Fracture patterns

   

0.664

 Simple (12-A)

54 (44.3%)

27 (45.8%)

27 (42.8%)

0.428

  Spiral (12-A1)

12 (9.9%)

7 (11.9%)

5 (7.9%)

 

  Oblique (12-A2)

15 (12.3%)

8 (13.6%)

7 (11.1%)

 

  Transverse (12-A3)

27 (22.1%)

12 (20.3%)

15 (23.8%)

 

 Wedge (12-B)

48 (39.3%)

21 (35.6%)

27 (42.9%)

0.860

  Spiral wedge (12-B1)

21 (17.3%)

10 (16.9%)

11 (17.5%)

 

  Bending wedge (12-B2)

25 (20.5%)

10 (16.9%)

15 (23.8%)

 

  Fragmented wedge (12-B3)

2 (1.5%)

1 (1.8%)

1 (1.6%)

 

 Complex (12-C)

20 (16.4%)

11 (18.6%)

9 (14.3%)

0.673

  Spiral (12-C1)

12 (9.8%)

6 (10.2%)

6 (9.5%)

 

  Segmental (12-C2)

3 (2.5%)

2 (3.4%)

1 (1.6%)

 

  Irregular (12-C3)

5 (4.1%)

3 (5.0%)

2 (3.2%)

 

Fracture location

   

0.789

 Proximal third

27 (22.1%)

12 (20.3%)

15 (23.8%)

 

 Middle third

65 (53.3%)

31 (52.5%)

34 (54.0%)

 

 Distal third

30 (22.1%)

16 (27.1%)

14 (22.2%)

 
  1. DCR-ESIN double-crossed retrograde elastic stable intramedullary nailing, LC-DCP limited-contact dynamic compression plate