Skip to main content

Official Journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology

Table 3 Comparison between younger and older patients treated with distal ulna hook plate osteosynthesis

From: Ulna hook plate osteosynthesis for ulna head fracture associated with distal radius fracture

 

Group 1 (n = 26)

Group 2 (n = 22)

 

Age

 < 65 years

 > 65 years

 

Mechanism

 High-energy trauma

12

0

 

 Low-energy fall

14

22

 

AO/OTA classification (distal radius fracture)

 Type A

11

10

 

 Type B

0

0

 

 Type C

15

12

 

Biyani classification (distal ulna fracture)

 Type I

6

6

 

 Type II

3

1

 

 Type III

4

4

 

 Type IV

13

11

 

Range of motion

 Wrist flexion

64°

55°

***

 Wrist extension

62°

50°

***

 Pronation

85°

83°

 

 Supination

81°

79°

 

Strength

 Grip strength

27.2

13.5

***

 Pinch strencth

8.2

4.5

***

Q-DASH score

8 (± 13)

17 (± 23)

 

Mayo wrist score

90 (± 11)

90 (± 8)

 

Complications

 Discomfort or pain due to implant

12 cases

2 cases

***

 Hypoesthesia (dorsal branch)

3 cases

1 cases

 

 CRPS

1 case

0 case

 

 Nonunion

1 case

1 case

 

 Implant displacement

0 case

1 case

 
  1. Q-DASH Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand, CRPS complex regional pain syndrome; *** stastistical significant difference (p<0.05)
  2. ***stastistical significant difference (p < 0.05)