Skip to main content

Official Journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology

Table 4 The acceptable combined anteversions and acceptable reconstructions (all six criteria were matched) for every stem design stratified according to two classes of femoral anteversion; note that the differences between the groups were significant

From: Which stem in total hip arthroplasty for developmental hip dysplasia? A comparative study using a 3D CT-based software for pre-operative surgical planning

Femoral anteversion

Stem design

Pearson’s chi-square test (p value)

Single wedge

Anatomical

Conical

Acceptable combined anteversion

Acceptable combined anteversion

Acceptable combined anteversion

Yes

No

Yes

No

Yes

No

< 25° (74 cases)

63 (85.1%)

11 (14.9%)

52 (70.3%)

23 (29.7%)

72 (97.3%)

2 (2.7%)

 < 0.0007

≥ 25° (126 cases)

90 (71.4%)

36 (28.6%)

65 (51.6%)

61 (48.4%)

125 (99.2%)

1 (0.8%)

 < 0.0001

 

Acceptable reconstruction (all parameters)

Acceptable reconstruction (all parameters)

Acceptable reconstruction (all parameters)

Pearson’s chi-square test (p value)

Yes

No

Yes

No

Yes

No

 

< 25° (74 cases)

58 (78.4%)

16 (21.6%)

44 (59.5%)

30 (40.5%)

63 (85.1%)

11 (14.9%)

0.0096

≥ 25° (126 cases)

80 (63.5%)

46 (37.5%)

43 (34.1%)

83 (65.9%)

111 (88.1%)

15 (11.9%)

 < 0.0001