Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology

Official Journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology

Table 5 Outcomes of different surgical techniques for the management of patients with poor quality of proximal femoral bone stock

From: Proximal femoral replacement for non-neoplastic conditions: a systematic review on current outcomes

Surgical technique	Complications								HHS pre–post difference
Surgical technique	Direct mortality	Reoperation	Revision	Dislocation	Infection	Aseptic loosening	Component fracture	Periprosthetic fracture	HHS pre–post difference
PFR	1.4%	20.3%	15.4%	10.2%	7.4%	5.0%	0.2%	2.4%	+33
Revision stem	2.3% [53]	11% [54]	13.2% [55]; 5.9% [53]	1.0% [54]; 3.0% [55]; 7.8% [53]	0.5% [54]; 2.9% [55]; 4.9% [53]	1.3% [54]; 3.1% [55]; 5.8% [53]	1.7% [56]; 2.3% [57]	0.5% [54]; 3.1% [53]	+37 [53]
APC	0% [58]	60% [59]	16.8% [13]; 26.5% [59]; 14% [60]	12.8% [13]; 11.1% [59]; 8% [60]	6.9% [59]; 4% [60]	5.5% [59]; 12% [60]	1.4% [59]	allograft 5.6% femoral 2.8% [59]	+41 [59]; +34 [61]
TFR	0% [62]	33% [63]	21–30% [64]; 18.5% [63]	6–28% [64]; 10% [63]	4–35% [64]; 19% [63]	4% [63]	0–11% [64]	0–1.3% [65]	+14–35 [64]
Resection arthroplasty	10% [66]	8% [66]	–	–	15% [66]	–	–	–	Pain relief 85–100% [67]

Back to article page