Skip to main content

Official Journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology

Table 5 Results of sensitivity analysis to assess the effects of each study on pooled WMD of outcomes

From: The effectiveness of vibration therapy for muscle peak torque and postural control in individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials

Outcome

No. of included studies

 

Pre-sensitivity analysis

 

Post-sensitivity analysis

Upper and lower of EF

95% CI

Pooled WMD

Excluded studies

95% CI

Pooled WMD

ML postural control (CE)

326, 25, 30

Upper

–1.48, –0.27

–0.87

Brunetti

–1.27, –0.26

–0.87

Lower

  

Fu

–2.18, 0.19

–0.99

AP postural control (CE)

426, 25, 35, 30

Upper

–0.2.78, 1.62

–0.58

Moezy

–2.51, 2.69

0.09

Lower

  

Salvarani

–2.77, 1.62

–0.57

ML postural control (OE)

326, 25, 24

Upper

–1.26, 1.77

0.26

Brunetti

1.26, 2.33

1.80

Lower

  

Moezy

–1.40, 0.04

–0.68

AP postural control (OE)

326, 25, 35

Upper

–0.98, 0.01

–0.49

Salvarani

–0.98, 0.01

–0.48

Lower

  

Fu

–1.60, –0.12

–0.86

Hamstring PT

326, 35, 31

Upper

4.51, 20.83

12.67

All

4.51, 20.83

12.67

Lower

  

All

4.51, 20.83

12.67

Quadriceps PT

923, 24, 26, 28,31, 32, 33, 34, 35

Upper

–0.06, 0.29

0.11

da Costa

–0.01, 0.33

0.15

Lower

  

Salvarani

–0.09, 0.26

0.08

  1. PT peak torque, AP anterioposterior, ML mediolateral, CE closed-eye, OE open-eye