Skip to main content

Official Journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology

Table 3 Studies of CCK implants in primary total knee arthroplasty with minimum 5-year follow-up

From: Satisfactory mid-term outcomes of condylar-constrained knee implants in primary total knee arthroplasty: clinical and radiological follow-up

Authors

(year of publication)

No. of knees

No. of primary CCK

Mean age at index (years)

(range)

Mean follow-up (years) (range)

Reoperations for aseptic loosening (rate)

Reoperations for infection (rate)

Reoperations for

any reason

(rate)

Infections

(rate)

Lachiewicz et al. [12]

42

20

67 (40–91)

9 (5–16)

1 (5%)

0 (0%)

1 (5%)

0 (0%)

Lachiewicz et al. [13]

27

27

74 (28–94)

5 (2–12)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

2 (7.4%)

2 (7.4%)

Nam et al. [34]

190

190

72

7

5 (2.6%)

1 (0.5%)

8 (4.2%)

1 (0.5%)

Maynard et al. [33]

127

107

68 (42–86)

9 (7–13)

0 (0%)

2 (1.6%)

13 (10.2%)

4 (3.1%)

Cholewinski et al. [18]

43

43

66 (21–88)

12 (10–14)

0 (0%)

2 (4.7%)

8 (18.6%)

4 (9.3%)

Luque et al. [11]

89

89

71

7 (2–8)

2 (2.2%)

6 (6.7%)

11 (12%)

6 (6.7%)

Ruel et al. [35]

142

142

N/A

5 (2–10)

7 (4.9%)

2 (1.4%)

14 (9.9%)

2 (1.4%)

Martin et al. [22]

427

427

65

5 (2–12)

19 (4.4%)

5 (1.2%)

75 (17.6%)

26 (6.1%)

Feng et al. [19]

48

15

61 (29–81)

6 (3–8)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

Ye et al. [17]

51

31

64 (52–76)

6 (4–8)

0 (0%)

1 (3.2%)

1 (2%)

1 (3.2%)

Tripathi et al. [37]

100

100

59 (45–70)

7

1 (1%)

1(1%)

3 (3%)

2 (2%)

Siqueira et al. [37]

247

247

67

8 (2–15)

2 (0.8%)

13 (5.3%)

22 (8.9%)

13 (5.3%)

Li et al. [14]

43

43

65 (60–72)

5 (2–10)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

2 (4.7%)

0 (0%)

Johnson et al. [20]

21

21

54 (39–59)

6 (2–12)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

2 (9.5%)

0 (0%)

Mancino et al. (current study)

47

47

72 (43–86)

9 (6–12)

0 (0%)

2 (4.3%)

3 (6.4%)

2 (4.3%)

  1. N/A not available