Functional outcomes and clinical strength assessment after infraspinatus-sparing surgical approach to scapular fracture: Does it really make a difference?

Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology

Official Journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology

Table 3 Patient follow-up data

N	Group	Follow-up (years)	Age (years)	Gender	Type of work	Mechanism of injury	BMI (kg/cm²)	Dominant arm	AO/OTA classification	Clavicle fracture	Rib fracture	PNX
1	MJ	1.6	44	M	MW	MVC	25	Yes	C2	Yes	Yes	Yes
2	MJ	2.1	35	M	MW	BC	23.5	Yes	C3	No	Yes	No
3	MJ	2.8	59	M	NMW	MVC	21.5	No	C3	No	No	No
4	MJ	2.9	54	M	NMW	MVC	25.1	No	C2	No	Yes	Yes
5	MJ	3.1	46	M	MW	MVC	28.4	Yes	A3	Yes	No	No
6	MJ	1	53	M	NMW	BC	23.7	Yes	C1	No	Yes	Yes
7	MJ	2.8	45	M	MW	MVC	24.2	Yes	C2	No	No	No
8	MJ	2.4	52	M	U	FFH	24.8	No	A3	Yes	Yes	Yes
9	CJ	4.2	58	M	MW	MVC	24.6	Yes	C3	No	Yes	No
10	CJ	2.8	50	M	MW	LHT	24.5	Yes	C2	No	Yes	No
11	CJ	4.3	52	M	NMW	MVC	26.3	Yes	A3	Yes	Yes	Yes
12	CJ	3.8	45	M	MW	MVC	25.9	No	C1	Yes	No	No
13	CJ	4.8	50	F	NMW	MVC	20.2	Yes	C2	No	Yes	Yes
14	CJ	5	38	M	U	BC	24.1	No	A3	Yes	No	No

N patient number, U unemployed, MW manual worker, NMW nonmanual worker, MVC motor vehicle collision, BC bicycle collision, LHT low-energy trauma, FFH fall from height, PNX pneumothorax