Skip to main content

Official Journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology

Table 1 Baseline characteristics: demographic and fracture data

From: Functional outcomes and clinical strength assessment after infraspinatus-sparing surgical approach to scapular fracture: Does it really make a difference?

 

CJ group

MJ group

p-value

Total

No. of patients

6

8

/

14

Follow-up (years)

4.15 (±0.78)

2.33 (±0.72)

< 0.001

3.11 (±1.17)

Age (years)

48.8 (±6.76)

48.5 (±7.5)

0.93

48.6 (±6.92)

Gender

Male = 5, female = 1

Male = 8, female = 0

0.23

Male = 13, female = 1

Weight (kg)

76.1 (±14.14)

74 (±9.3)

0.73

74.9 (±11.17)

Height (cm)

178.5 (±9.02)

173.5 (±8.05)

0.29

175.6 (±8.53)

BMI (kg/m2)

23.7 (±2.54)

24.53 (±1.94)

0.5

24.17 (±2.17)

Dominant side

2

4

0.87

/

AO classification

A3 = 1

C1 = 1

A3 = 2

C1 = 1

0.78

/

AO/OTA (14 = scapula)

C2 = 2

C3 = 2

C2 = 3

C3 = 2

Type of fixation

Acumed lateral border plate = 6

Acumed lateral border plate = 7

Acumed glenoid plate = 1

/

/

Clavicle fracture

4

5

1

9

Rib fractures

4

5

0.87

9

Pneumothorax

2

4

0.53

6