Skip to main content

Official Journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology

Table 3 Rate of complications according to different studies

From: Management of chronic unstable acromioclavicular joint injuries

Study

n

Technique

Mean follow-up (months)

Rate of complications

Type of complications

Tauber et al. [18]

24

12 patients, modified Weaver–Dunn

12 patients, autogenous semitendinosus tendon graft

37

12.5% (3/24)

Semitendinous group, 1 mild loss of reduction. 1 mild hyperesthesia of the saphenous nerve. Weaver–Dunn group, 1 superficial wound infection

Boileau et al. [25]

10

All-arthroscopic Weaver–Dunn–Chuinard procedure with double-button fixation

12.8

20% (2/10)

1 Superficial infection of the superior portal. 1 lateral migration of the subcoracoid EndoButton

Carofino et al. [31]

22 reconstructions in 21 patients. 16 were available for follow-up

Open anatomical CC ligament reconstruction

21

18.75% (3/16)

1 Persistent ACJ pain. 1 chronic infection, requiring removal of the allograft and latissimus flap coverage. 1 loss of reduction

Yoo et al. [32]

13

Arthroscopically assisted anatomical CC reconstruction with tendon graft

17

23% (3/13)

3 Loss of reduction. In all patients, mild displacement

Fraschini et al. [34]

60 managed surgically and 30 managed conservatively

30 CC reconstructions with DACRON®, 30 CC reconstructions with LARS®

15

43% (13/30) in the DACRON® group and 3.3% (1/30) in the LARS® group

DACRON® group: 7 recurrences due to neoligament rupture, 4 aseptic separations, 1 clavicle fracture and 1 coracoid fracture. LARS® group: 1 neoligament rupture

Cook et al. [43]

10

Arthroscopic CC ligament reconstruction with GraftRope (Arthrex) plus tendon allograft

9.7

80% (8/10)

8 Loss of reduction, 4 revision surgeries