Skip to main content

Official Journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology

Table 4 Comparative analyses of disability and pain by Clavien−Dindo classification at 1 and 2 years (30% difference)

From: Influence of perioperative complication severity on 1- and 2-year outcomes of low back surgery

Variables

Odds ratio (95% confidence interval)

P value

Unadjusted oswestry disability score

 Grade I–II Clavien–Dindo classification (year 1)

0.98 (0.54, 1.80)

0.96

 Grade I–II Clavien–Dindo classification (year 2)

2.13 (1.01, 4.52)

0.04

Adjusted Oswestry Disability Scorea

  

 Grade I–II Clavien–Dindo classification (year 1)

1.13 (0.57, 2.21)

0.72

 Grade I–II Clavien–Dindo classification (year 2)

1.74 (0.73, 4.19)

0.21

Unadjusted visual analog scale for pain

 Grade I–II Clavien–Dindo classification (year 1)

0.97 (0.52, 1.81)

0.93

 Grade I–II Clavien–Dindo classification (year 2)

2.88 (1.08, 7.66)

0.03

Adjusted visual analog scale for paina

 Grade I–II Clavien–Dindo classification (year 1)

0.91 (0.45, 1.82)

0.78

 Grade I–II Clavien–Dindo classification (year 2)

2.23 (0.78, 6.36)

0.13

  1. Bold numbers indicates significant difference
  2. aControl variables include gender, number of spinal levels, disability score at baseline, and SF-36 physical and mental component summary scores