Skip to main content

Official Journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology

Table 1 Demographic and operative details of included studies

From: Outcomes of intramedullary nailing for acute proximal humerus fractures: a systematic review

Authors

Publication date

Type of study

No. of patients

Neer fracture type

Mean age (years)

Female/male

Mean follow-up (months)

Minimum follow-up (months)

Baseline

Final

Two-part

Three-part

Four-part

Hatzidakis et al. [7]

2011

Retrospective

48

38

38

0

0

65

28/10

20

12

Nolan et al. [8]

2011

Retrospective

18

13

9

4

0

71

10/3

42

24

Adedapo et al. [11]

2001

Retrospective

16

16

0

10

6

67.1

NR

12

12

Lin et al. [13]

1998

Retrospective

16–18

16

6

0

0

67.6

10/6

19.6

14

Konrad et al. [15]

2012

Prospective

58a

47

0

47

0

64.8

447/11

12

12

Trepat et al. [17]

2012

Retrospective

15

13

3

0

0

64.5

7/6

12

12

Gradl et al. [19]

2007

Prospective

69–96b

69

7

35

17

67.2

67/36

12

12

Lin et al. [23]

2006

Prospective

22–27

22

0

22

0

53.3

10/12

23.9

19

Kazakos et al. [24]

2007

Retrospective

31

27

16

11

0

65.9

17/10

12

12

Koike et al. [25]

2008

Retrospective

54

54

29

22

3

66

44/10

18

13

Linhart et al. [26]

2007

Retrospective

97

51

5

31

5

68.4

39/12

12

12

Park et al. [27]

2012

Retrospective

43

43

0

43

0

60.2

34/9

65

35

Sforzo et al. [28]

2009

Retrospective

14

14

7

5

2

56

9/5

40

12

Zhu et al. [29]

2011

Prospective

28

25

5

0

0

54.8

16/9

36

36

Totals

  

529–563

448

185

230

33

 

338/139c

  

Frequency-weighted mean

       

64.3

 

22.6

16.4

  1. NR, not reported
  2. aOnly baseline demographic data provided
  3. bFour four-part fracture dislocations and 12 fractures with shaft extension excluded. Mean age and follow-up reported for entire baseline cohort of 112 patients, but weighted for 69 patients
  4. cTotal does not add up to total patient number given (b)