Official Journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Table 4 Meta-analysis of studies exploring effect of coincident hip fracture in patients with hip and wrist fracture
Study | Number of patients | Prevalence of hip fracture with wrist fracture | Mean age isolated hip vs combined fracture | Female: male isolated hip vs combined fracture | 30-day mortality isolated hip vs combined fracture | 1-year mortality isolated hip vs combined fracture | Length of stay isolated hip vs combined fracture (median) | Adjusted mortality ratio isolated hip vs combined fracture |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mulhall et al. [2] | 28 | 3.7 % | 77 vs 84* | 3:1 vs 8:1* | 10.3 vs 5.6 % (in-hospital mortality)* | 15.6 vs 20.4 (mean) | ||
Tow et al. [4] | 33 | 2.6 % | 78 vs 79 | 2:1 vs 6:1 | 17 vs 23 | |||
Robinson et al. [5] | 34 | 1.8 % | 82 vs 83 | 4:1 vs 7:1 | 6.4 vs 7.7 % | 28 vs 19 % | 13 vs 17.5 | |
Shabat et al. [3] | 46 | 7:1 (no data of isolated hip fracture) | 13 (no data of isolated hip fracture) | |||||
This study | 88 | 1.7 % | 80 vs 79 | 4:1 vs 9:1 | 9.6 vs 9.1 % | 30.6 vs 25 % | 13 vs 18 | 0.86 (95 % CI 0.57–1.28) |
Meta-analysis | 229 | 2.0 (95 % CI 1.7–2.4) | 79.8 vs 80.5 | 3:1 vs 7:1 (p < 0.0001) | Relative risk 0.93 (95 % CI 0.53–1.65) | 29 vs 24 % (p = 0.2) relative risk 0.81 (95 % CI 0.58–1.13) |