Official Journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Table 3 Range of motion comparison between ESIN and percutaneous pinning groups
Flexion (°) (mean ± SD) | Extension (°) (mean ± SD) | Pronation (°) (mean ± SD) | Supination (°) (mean ± SD) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fractured | Uninjured | Fractured | Uninjured | Fractured | Uninjured | Fractured | Uninjured | |
ESIN (N = 7) | ||||||||
All fractures | 145 ± 6 | 152 ± 5 | 1 ± 1 | 0 | 85 ± 4 | 85 ± 3 | 86 ± 3 | 86 ± 3 |
Type III | 148 | 150 | 0 | 0 | 90 | 90 | 85 | 85 |
Type IV | 146 ± 6 | 151 ± 5 | 1 ± 1 | 0 | 85 ± 5 | 85 ± 3 | 86 ± 3 | 86 ± 3 |
Percutaneous pinning (N = 13) | ||||||||
All fractures | 140 ± 14 | 151 ± 4 | 2 ± 3 | 0 | 83 ± 7 | 85 ± 2 | 82 ± 12 | 85 ± 3 |
Type III | 115 ± 28 | 152 ± 6 | 6 ± 5 | 0 | 73 ± 18 | 86 ± 1 | 62 ± 31 | 82 ± 3 |
Type IV | 139 ± 5 | 154 ± 2 | 2 ± 2 | 0 | 82 ± 2 | 84 ± 2 | 85 ± 3 | 85 ± 3 |