Official Journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Table 2 Clinical and radiological comparison between the ESIN and percutaneous pinning group
Associated injuries | MEPS | Radiological alignment | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Excellent N (%) | Good N (%) | Medium N (%) | Poor N (%) | Excellent N (%) | Good N (%) | ||
ESIN | |||||||
All fractures (N = 7) | 5 (71) | 2 (29) | – | – | 6 (67) | 1 (33) | |
Type III (N = 4) | 3 (75) | 1 (25) | – | – | 4 (100) | – | |
Type IV (N = 3) | 1 Olecranon fracture (N = 1) | 2 (67) | 1 (33) | – | – | 2 (67) | 1 (33) |
Percutaneous pinning | |||||||
All fractures (N = 13) | 9 (69) | 3 (23) | 1 (8) | – | 10 (77) | 3 (23) | |
Type III (N = 10) | 1 Olecranon fracture (N = 1) | 8 (80) | 2 (20) | – | – | 9 (90) | 1 (10) |
Type IV (N = 3) | Olecranon fracture + LCL lesion (N = 1) | 1 (33) | 1 (33) | 1 (33) | – | 1 (33) | 2 (67) |