Skip to main content

Official Journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology

  • Original
  • Published:

Cement mantle defects in total hip arthroplasty: influence of stem size and cementing technique


The cause of isolated osteolysis in the femoral shaft around stem implants in patients with cemented THR has so far not been established. A number of factors have been considered such as torsional stability of the femoral stem implant, the time of reduction intraoperatively after cementing and iatrogenic and load-induced defects in the cement mantle. The aim of this in vitro investigation was to determine if the cementing technique or the thickness of the prosthesis stem, and thus its bending strength, influences the formation, extent and localisation of cement mantle defects. In vitro biomechanical loading tests were performed on twelve anatomically shaped femoral stem prostheses of two different thicknesses which were implanted in artificial bone. Six of the implants were fixed by conventional cementing technique, the other six by means of the vacuum technique. Compared with thicker implant stems, the slimmer stems fixed with the conventional cementing technique had a higher number of cracks in the cement mantle. Pore formation was localised predominantly in the interface area between the bone cement and the “cancellous” bone or “cortex” of the artificial bone. This was observed especially in the non-vacuum mixed cement, regardless of stem thickness. Large pores were found mainly in the cement around the thicker stems which had been mixed by the conventional method. The thickness of the stems, whether fixed with vacuum-mixed or non-vacuum mixed cement, had no significant influence on the percentage of pore area in the cement. In the nonvacuum mixed cement, there was no significant difference between the percentages of pore area in the proximal and distal parts of the shafts, whereas in the vacuum mixed cement the percentage of pore area was significantly larger in the distal than in the proximal part of the shafts. In the specimens of both stem sizes, the percentage of pore area in the vacuum mixed cement was significantly smaller than in the nonvacuum mixed cement. This explains the greater fatigue strength of vacuum mixed cement. The cyclic loading on the thicker stem prostheses, especially in those fixed with vacuum mixed cement, resulted in fracture between the prosthesis tip and the clamping device due to the local stiffness of the artificial bone. Due to this unfavourable biomechanical property of the artificial bone, further studies will be carried out on human femurs. Nevertheless, in view of the results presented here, the vacuum mixing technique has to recommended as the “state of the art” method in cemented total hip arthroplasty.


  1. Katzer A, Behnke B, von Foerster G (2001) Osteolysis of the femoral shaft after implantation of a cemented hip prosthesis. J Biomech 34:68

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC (1979) “Modes of failure” of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop 141:17–27

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. McCormack BA, Prendergast PJ (1999) Microdamage accumulation in the cement layer of hip replacements under flexural loading. J Biomech 32:467–475

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. McCormack BA, Prendergast PJ, Gallagher DG (1996) An experimental study of damage accumulation in cemented hip prostheses. Clin Biomech 11:214–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Katzer A, Ince A, Wodtke J, Loehr J.F. (2006) Component exchange in treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures. J Arthroplasty 21:572–579

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Race A, Miller MA, Ayers DC, Mann KA (2003) Early cement damage around a femoral stem is concentrated at the cement/bone interface. J Biomech 36:489–496

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Culleton P, Prendergast PJ, Taylor D (1993) Fatigue failure in the cement mantle of an artificial hip joint. Clin Mater 12:95–102

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fish DN, Hoffman HM, Danziger LH (1992) Antibiotic impregnated cement use in US hospitals. Am J Hosp Pharm 49:2469–2474

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kühn KD (2000) Bone Cements. Springer-Verlag Berlin, pp 21–26

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Dunne NJ, Orr JF, Mushipe MT, Eveleigh RJ (2003) The relationship between porosity and fatigue characteristics of bone cements. Biomaterials 24:239–245

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Maloney WJ, Schmalzried T, Harris WH (2002) Analysis of long-term cemented total hip arthroplasty retrievals. Clin Orthop 405:70–78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jasty M, Maloney WJ, Bragdon CR, O’Connor DO, Haire T, Harris WH (1991) The initiation of failure in cemented femoral components of hip arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73:551–558

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lennon AB, Prendergast PJ (2002) Residual stress due to curing can initiate damage in porous bone cement: experimental and theoretical evidence. J Biomech 35:311–321

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Berry DJ, Harmsen WS, Ilstrup DM (1998) The natural history of debonding of the femoral component from the cement and its effect on long-term survival of Charnley total hip replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80:715–721

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Verdonschot N, Huiskes R (1997) Cement debonding process of total hip arthroplasty stems. Clin Orthop 336:297–307

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wroblewski BM (1999) The natural history of debonding of the femoral component from the cement and its effect on long-term survival of Charnley total hip replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81:1501

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Katzer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Katzer, A., Ince, A., Hahn, M. et al. Cement mantle defects in total hip arthroplasty: influence of stem size and cementing technique. J Orthopaed Traumatol 8, 167–172 (2007).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

Key words