Skip to main content

Official Journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology

Table 2 Patient characteristics

From: Lateralising reverse shoulder arthroplasty using bony increased offset (BIO-RSA) or increasing glenoid component diameter: comparison of clinical, radiographic and patient reported outcomes in a matched cohort

 

BIO-RSA 38 (n = 36)

RSA 42 (n = 34)

p-value

Adjusted p-value

Female, n (%)

22 (61)

22 (65)

A0.756

1.000

Age, mean years (SD)

70 (8)

73 (7)

B0.0424

0.806

BMI, mean kg/m2 (SD)

26 (4)

26 (4)

B0.990

1.000

Diagnosis, n (%)

  

C0.912

1.000

  Osteoarthritis

13 (36)

14 (41)

  

  Cuff tear arthropathy

12 (33)

9 (26)

  

  Irreparable cuff tear

10 (28)

10 (29)

  

  Acute fracture

1 (3)

1 (3)

  

ASA classification, n (%)

  

A0.938

1.000

  I

8 (24)

15 (42)

  

  II

21 (62)

15 (42)

  

  III

5 (15)

6 (17)

  

Comorbidities, n (%)

    

  Diabetes

3 (8)

2 (6)

C1.000

1.000

  Cardiological

20 (56)

18 (53)

A0.826

1.000

  Thyroid disease

5 (14)

4 (12)

C1.000

1.000

  Gastroenterological

4 (11)

4 (12)

C1.000

1.000

  Respiratory

0 (0)

3 (9)

C0.109

1.000

  Urological

4 (11)

3 (9)

C1.000

1.000

  Neurological

1 (3)

5 (14)

C0.199

1.000

  Psychological

2 (6)

1 (3)

C0.609

1.000

  Oncological

0 (0)

1 (3)

C0.486

1.000

  Smoking, n (%)

5 (14)

3 (9)

C0.711

1.000

  Dominant side operated, n (%)

12 (52)

7 (32)

A0.167

1.000

Previous surgery, n (%)

12 (33)

6 (18)

A0.133

1.000

  Rotator cuff

11 (31)

3 (9)

A0.0231

0.462

  Latarjet

1 (3)

2 (6)

C0.609

1.000

  Other

1 (3)

1 (3)

C1.000

1.000

Follow-up time, median years (IQR)

2.3 (2.1–2.5)

3.7 (2.2–5.4)

D0.0006

0.0126

  1. BMI body mass index, BIO-RSA bony increased offset reverse shoulder arthroplasty, RSA reverse shoulder arthroplasty, SD standard deviation
  2. Achi-square
  3. Bt-test
  4. CFisher exact test
  5. DMann–Whitney U test