Skip to main content

Official Journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology

Table 2 Time to event outcomes of the study cohort after the second stage of a two-stage exchange revision for knee periprosthetic joint infection (PJI)†

From: Evaluation of time to reimplantation as a risk factor in two-stage revision with static spacers for periprosthetic knee joint infection

Treatment outcome

All patients (n = 163)

Groups according to time to reimplantation (TTR)

p value

 ≤ 94 days (n = 104)

 > 94 days (n = 59)

Follow-up after stage two in months, reverse KM median (95% CI)

38.0 (29.0–50.0)

55.1 (38.0–62.0)

27.0 (22.8–30.5)

0.0002**

Infection control

 Number of events (reinfection), n

37

16

21

 HR of reinfection (95% CI)

 

Reference

3.32 (1.71–6.44)

0.0003*

 KM est of reinfection-free rate at 2 years, % (95% CI)

82% (74–87)

89% (81–94)

67% (52–79)

0.0002**

 KM est of reinfection-free rate at 5 years, % (95% CI)

68% (58–76)

80% (69–87)

33% (11–57)

Aseptic revision surgery after second stage

 Number of events (aseptic revision), n

21

16

5

 HR of aseptic revision (95% CI)

 

Reference

0.81 (0.29–2.24)

0.6752*

 KM est of aseptic-revision-free rate at 2 years, % (95% CI)

91% (85–95)

88% (79–93)

98% (84–100)

0.6806**

 KM est of aseptic-revision-free rate at 5 years, % (95% CI)

76% (64–84)

76% (62–85)

76% (48–90)

Overall survival after second stage

 Number of events (death), n

28

17

11

 HR of death (95% CI)

 

Reference

2.17 (0.98–4.77)

0.0622*

 KM est of overall survival rate at 2 years after stage two, % (95% CI)

89% (82–94)

92% (83–96)

85% (69–93)

0.0494**

 KM est of overall survival rate at 5 years after stage two, % (95% CI)

74% (63–82)

80% (68–88)

53% (23–76)

  1. Bold font indicates p values ≤ 0.05
  2. As the time to reimplantation was the independent variable in our model, only patients who completed stage two were included in the analysis. The patient flow chart in Fig. 1 gives further information on the patients who did not undergo stage two
  3. * p value from the Wald test of the Cox regression including TTR group as the only factor
  4. ** Comparison of the whole Kaplan–Meier curves for the TTR≤ 94 days group and  the TTR > 94 days group using the log-rank (Mantel–Cox) test
  5. HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval, KM est Kaplan–Meier estimate, reverse KM reverse Kaplan–Meier method