Skip to main content

Official Journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology

Table 2 Comparison of spinopelvic parameters between the non-ASD and ASD groups

From: Validation of Roussouly classification in predicting the occurrence of adjacent segment disease after short-level lumbar fusion surgery

 

Non-ASD

ASD

P value

Preoperative

 PT, °

18.3 ± 7.5

17.9 ± 8.6

0.731

 PI, °

51.2 ± 9.3

49.2 ± 9.9

0.128

 SS, °

32.9 ± 6.9

31.3 ± 8.9

0.173

 LL, °

45.1 ± 10.6

39.2 ± 15.0

0.004

 DL, °

28.6 ± 8.6

26.1 ± 11.0

0.090

 SL, °

19.6 ± 7.8

18.9 ± 11.1

0.663

 LDI, %

65.5 ± 21.2

67.5 ± 23.0

0.519

 SVA, mm

11.6 ± 36.8

28.5 ± 47.7

0.010

PI − LL

  ≤ 10°

110 (66.3%)

46 (67.6%)

0.839

  > 10°

56 (33.7%)

22 (32.4%)

 

Postoperative

 PT, °

17.1 ± 6.0

16.4 ± 7.6

0.501

 PI, °

51.7 ± 9.2

48.9 ± 9.7

0.042

 SS, °

34.6 ± 6.7

32.6 ± 8.2

0.047

 LL, °

48.9 ± 9.6

43.9 ± 11.1

0.001

 DL, °

31.3 ± 8.2

27.4 ± 8.5

0.001

 SL, °

20.8 ± 7.3

21.0 ± 6.7

0.803

 LDI, %

64.9 ± 15.3

63.2 ± 16.6

0.442

 SVA, mm

7.8 ± 28.7

7.8 ± 28.1

0.994

PI − LL

  ≤ 10°

132 (79.5%)

48 (70.6%)

0.141

  > 10°

34 (20.5%)

20 (29.4%)

 

Roussouly type match

 Matched

86 (51.8%)

13 (19.1%)

 < 0.001

 Mismatched

80 (48.2%)

55 (80.9%)

Theoretical sagittal profile

 Roussouly type 1

17 (10.2%)

8 (11.8%)

0.091

 Roussouly type 2

15 (9.0%)

14 (20.6%)

 Roussouly type 3

102 (61.4%)

34 (50.0%)

 Roussouly type 4

32 (19.3%)

12 (17.6%)

Current sagittal profile

 Roussouly type 1

22 (13.3%)

12 (17.6%)

 < 0.001

 Roussouly type 2

38 (22.9%)

36 (52.9%)

 Roussouly type 3

92 (55.4%)

12 (17.6%)

 Roussouly type 4

14 (8.4%)

8 (11.8%)

  1. Values are presented as number (%) or mean ± standard deviation unless otherwise indicated
  2. ASD adjacent segment disease, PT pelvic tilt, PI pelvic incidence, SS sacral slope, LL lumbar lordosis, DL distal lordosis, SL segmental lordosis, LDI lordosis distribution index, SVA sagittal vertical axis