Reconstruction plate versus minimal invasive retrograde titanium elastic nail fixation for displaced midclavicular fractures
© The Author(s) 2011
Received: 17 November 2010
Accepted: 29 August 2011
Published: 27 September 2011
Nonoperative management of midshaft clavicle fractures (MSCFs) is standard; however, it is now generally accepted that displaced midshaft clavicle fractures benefit from internal fixation. Plating and intramedullary fixation have become the accepted methods of fixation. The purpose of this study was to see if one method of fixation of clavicle fractures has a lower complication rate and higher union rate than the other.
Materials and methods
Between December 2003 and September 2008, 38 patients were treated randomly by either plating (plate group) or retrograde nailing (RTEN group). Primary outcome measures included functional Constant scores, radiological union rate and union time. Clinical and radiological assessments were performed at the 6th week and the 3rd, 6th and 12th month postoperatively. Secondary outcome measures included the perioperative data (mean surgery time, blood loss, wound size, and hospital stay), and the complication rates.
Similar results were found between the two groups regarding functional and radiological outcome after the 12th week (P > 0.05). However, earlier union and functional recovery were obtained at the 6th week for the RTEN group (P < 0.05). The rate of complications was significantly higher (15.8%) in the plate group compared with the RTEN group (0%; P > 0.05). In the plate group, significantly higher values were obtained for the perioperative data (P < 0.001).
Both techniques are equally effective at treating displaced midclavicular fractures, and give better function and fewer complications than nonoperative treatment. The RTEN technique has more advantages and lower complications than plating, making its use more favorable. It is recommended for athletes and young active individuals, and can be used as an alternative to conservative treatment or plate fixation.
KeywordsMidclavicular Fractures Titanium Elastic Nail Plate
Fractures of the clavicle have been reported to represent 2.6% of all fractures . The midshaft is the most frequently affected site, encompassing 69–82% of all clavicle fractures, and most fractures that occur in the midshaft are displaced [25, 27]. Midshaft clavicle fractures (MSCFs) in adults have traditionally been treated nonoperatively [12, 18, 27]. However, displaced or comminuted fractures carry a risk of symptomatic malunion, nonunion, and poor functional outcome with cosmetic deformity [3, 9, 31]. Recent studies have reported a rate of nonunion of 15%  following nonsurgical intervention. Early surgical intervention of MSCFs has resulted in improved outcomes and a decreased rate of nonunion and symptomatic malunion compared with nonoperative treatment [3, 6, 9]. However, the optimal treatment for isolated acute displaced MSCF remains controversial [31, 32].
Operative treatment of displaced MSCFs can be achieved successfully using plates [1, 22] or intramedullary (IM) implants like Rush pins , Kirschner wires , or nails . However, the use of the later rigid IM implants resulted in serious complications, such as intrathoracic migration and damage to the underlying structures [16, 21]. Recently, Jubel et al.  introduced a new IM nailing technique in which a single titanium elastic nail (TEN) is inserted in an antegrade manner from the sternal end of the clavicle to fix those fractures. He reported fewer complications and a higher rate of fracture healing than those previously reported with the use of rigid IM implants. Rehm et al.  treated 136 displaced MSCFs successfully using the same antegrade fixation technique with a single TEN. However, a risk of iatrogenic perforation of the lateral cortex in 5 patients was reported.
This prospective randomized study was designed to assess the effectiveness of minimally invasive retrograde titanium elastic nailing (RTEN) for the treatment of displaced MSCFs, and to compare its outcome with that of a standard anteroinferior plating technique.
Materials and methods
The study was approved by the local ethical committee and performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki as revised in 2000. All patients gave their informed consent.
Characteristics of the patients of both groups
Average age (years)
32.6 ± 5.9 (range 26–49)
30.3 ± 4.8 (range 24–45)
Cause of injury
Fall from height
Inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients were included in the study if their ages were between 16 and 60 years of age and they had suffered displaced midshaft clavicular fractures within the last 4 weeks with no cortical bone contact or shortening of over 15 mm, or if the fracture fragments were tenting or compromising the skin with an axial malalignment of over 30°. Patients were excluded if they had fractures with marked comminution or that were older than 4 weeks, ipsilateral injuries that could influence the recovery and the scoring systems, pathological fractures, open fractures, a congenital anomaly or bone disease, or if there was cellulites around the incision site for open reduction.
The RTEN surgical technique
The anteroinferior plating
For both groups, patients received arm sling protection for 1–2 weeks postoperatively, and then light daily activities such as writing or eating were allowed. Patients were encouraged to resume their normal daily activities after the 4th week when the pain was tolerated. Strenuous activities were discouraged before the 6th week from the trauma.
Following hospital discharge, patients underwent clinical and radiological evaluations at regular follow-up visits (FUV) at the 6th week and at the 3rd, 6th and 12th months postoperatively to assess fracture healing and function of the arm, and to record any complication.
The primary outcome measure
Shoulder function was evaluated according to the 100-point scoring system of Constant and Murley . This system combines assessments of subjective symptoms and objective findings. The overall grading is excellent if the total score ranges from 90 to 100, good for 80–89, fair for 70–79, and poor if the scores are 69 or less . Radiographic healing was defined as evidence of bridging callus or obliteration of the fracture lines. Clinical union was considered an absence of tenderness at the fracture site. Time to heal was then recorded when all of these criteria were fulfilled.
Secondary outcome measures
Operative time, amount of blood loss, and size of the surgical wound were recorded for every patient. The difference in the weights of the sponges pre- and postoperatively and the added volumes of suction were recorded to determine the amount of blood loss.
Complications such as nonunion, implant failure, wound infection, thoracic outlet syndrome, and refracture after implant removal were recorded.
At the end of the follow-up period (12th month), cosmetic outcome was assessed. The cosmetic appearance was determined with special regard to asymmetry of the shoulder, visible deformity, hypertrophic scars, or prominence of the implant under the skin. Asymmetry of the shoulder was determined by measuring the distance from the center of the jugular fossa to the lateral tip of the acromion. In comparison with the intact contralateral side, a difference of greater than 0.5 cm was considered to be significant asymmetry.
To evaluate the significance of the functional assessment of Constant scores across time, a generalized linear model (GLM) repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used. The perioperative data and the average bone union time were compared with the unpaired nonparametric Mann–Whitney test. Fisher’s exact test was used to compare the incidence rates of the two groups. All tests were done using Statistica version 6.0 and Graphpad Instat version 3.06 statistical software. P values < 0.05 were considered significant.
Surgeries were performed at a mean of 9.5 days ± 5.9 days (range 1–22 days; median, 9 days) after injury for the plate group and a mean of 10.2 days ± 6.2 days (range 1–23 days; median, 9 days) after injury for the RTEN group. In 16 patients, a nail diameter of 2.5 mm was used, while in 3 patients the 3 mm nail was used. The mean follow-up period was 18.6 ± 3.8 months (range 14–26 months) for the plate group and 14.5 ± 1.5 months (range 12–18 months) for the RTEN group.
The primary outcome results
Average constant scores between groups across time
Group A mean ± SD‡
95% confidence interval (CI)
Group B mean ± SD
95% confidence interval (CI)
62.1 ± 11.4
69.1 ± 9.2
77.3 ± 10.3
83.0 ± 8.7
84.7 ± 12.2
90.3 ± 7.3
89.9 ± 11.3
95.5 ± 5.3
At final evaluation, the overall grading of the results in the RTEN group was 17 excellent and 2 good, while in the plate group there were 14 excellent, 2 good, 1 fair, and 2 unsatisfactory results.
Secondary outcome results
Perioperative data comparisons between groups
Group A (N = 19)
Group B (N = 19)
Mean ± SD (range)
Mean ± SD (range)
Duration of surgery (min)
68.1 ± 10.9 (54–92)
44.1 ± 9.1 (28–64)
Mean wound size (cm)
8.5 ± 1.6 (6–11)
4.3 ± 0.8 (3–6)
Average blood loss (ml)
144.3 ± 31.5 (89–195)
65.4 ± 28 (27–100)
Mean hospital stay (days)
2.3 ± 0.8 (1–4)
1.4 ± 0.5 (1–2)
Major and cosmetic complications
Plate (N = 19)
RTEN (N = 19)
Thoracic outlet syndrome
Refracture after implant removal
Total major complications
Prominent implant under skin
There were 4 patients (21.1%) with hypertrophic scars and 3 patients (15.8%) had prominent implants under the skin in the plate group. In the RTEN group, one patient (5.3%) had asymptomatic hypertrophic callus and another 3 patients (15.8%) had a prominence at the cut bent end of the nail.
Although most middle-third clavicular fractures can be treated nonoperatively, several recent studies have demonstrated a poorer outcome in association with displaced, comminuted midshaft fractures that were treated nonoperatively [9, 26, 31]. Therefore, a selective surgical treatment for a midclavicular fracture is recommended [1, 12, 13].
In a recent randomized, prospective study in which nonoperative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures was compared with plate fixation, patients in the operative fixation group had significantly better functional outcomes, a lower rate of nonunion, and a lower incidence of symptomatic malunion . Most complications in the operative fixation group were hardware related.
Currently, plate fixation [14, 28] and IM titanium elastic nailing [13, 24] are the available methods for the treatment of severely displaced MSCFs. The options for plate location are anteroinferior and superior [4, 10, 12, 14]. The theoretical advantages of anteroinferior plating include less hardware prominence and the ability of the surgeon to direct instrumentation away from infraclavicular neurovascular structures [4, 14].
In this study, anteroinferior plating was compared with retrograde IM nailing for displaced MSCFs in adults.
The reported 31% risk of unsatisfactory results following nonoperative treatment in the Hill et al. study  was reduced in this study to 2/38 (5.3%) as a result of surgical intervention. The 15%  risk of nonunion in that study was also reduced to 2.6% in ours as a result of surgical intervention in both groups in this study.
Comparing the results of plating in this study with those reported in the literature, infection was found in one (5.5%), while the reported rates in the literature range from 0 to 18% [1–3]. However, infection was eventually controlled after plate removal in the eleventh month when X-rays showed evidence of bone union.
The results of plating compared favorably with those reported in the literature . Satisfactory results were obtained in 17 patients (89.5%) and unsatisfactory results in 2 (10.5%); nonunion was observed in one, and persistence of infection with implant loosening in another one. In the former, bone grafting was carried out in the presence of the implant, and in the latter, removal of the implant and surgical wound debridement was required to control infection. In both cases, bone union was achieved 3 months later.
The reported incidence of refracture following plate removal ranged from 0 to 8% [2, 22]. In this study, after the final follow-up, refracture occurred in one female obese patient who fell following plate removal. Fortunately, the fracture was undisplaced and no surgical intervention was required until the fracture had healed.
The use of the anteroinferior site for the 3.5 mm reconstruction plating allowed adequate fixation of the lateral fragment. This was facilitated by its easier contouring to fit the S shape of the clavicle than for other plates, thereby providing maximum fracture stability. The technique provides stable fixation, avoids risk to the vital structures below the clavicle, and has a low rate of implant prominence and low incidences of nonunion and implant failure.
The large wound size and extensive soft tissue stripping required for plate fixation and removal are disadvantages of plating techniques [1, 2]. In this study, the removal of plates necessitated new admissions, general anesthesia, and another large-sized incision, while nail removal was performed as an OPD under local anesthesia with minimal sedation and a tiny incision over the tip of the nail.
Intramedullary fixation is an attractive alternative that is much less invasive and avoids most of the problems encountered with plating. The clavicle, which is similar to other long bones, is usually best treated with IM methods [13, 24, 29].
Because of anatomic features of the clavicle , devices for IM fixation need to be flexible. Aside from the need for flexibility, the implant diameter needs to be small enough to enable its passage through the medullary space, which is narrow, especially in the middle third of the clavicle. Both its elasticity and small diameter mean that IM positioning is ideal and provides good stability . In this study, the nail diameters required for fixation were the 2.5 mm and the 3 mm, and these resulted in perfect adaptation to the complex anatomical shape of the clavicle with good stability. It has been clearly shown that RTEN fixation provides stable fixation and allows an earlier return to normal activities, as well as complete bone healing in all cases without major complications, in contrast with plate fixation. The present RTEN technique allowed the tip of the bent cut end of the nail to migrate only subcutaneously during the course of bone healing. Prominence of the tip of the nail occurred in 3 cases after the bone had healed, and the nails were removed under local infiltration anesthesia as an OPD procedure. This minimally invasive technique provides less soft tissue stripping than the plating technique and results in good biological fracture healing.
Both the anteroinferior plating and IM RTEN fixation techniques are equally effective for the treatment of acute displaced mid-shaft clavicular fractures. However, the present RTEN technique is simpler and quicker, is minimally invasive with less soft tissue injury, requires a shorter operating time, involves less blood loss, results in a shorter hospital stay, leads to faster bone union with 100% union rate, allows an earlier return to normal activities, and produces an excellent cosmetic outcome. In addition, if the implant needs to be removed, this is done under local anesthesia, with a tiny skin incision made over the tip of the nail.
The RTEN technique is recommended for the fixation of displaced mid-shaft clavicular fractures, especially for young active individuals or heavy manual laborers. It can be used as an alternative to conservative treatment or plate fixation.
Conflict of interest
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
- Ali KM, Lucas HK (1978) Plating of fractures of the middle third of the clavicle. Injury 9(4):263–267Google Scholar
- Bostman O, Manninen M, Pihlajamäki HH (1997) Complications of plate fixation in fresh displaced midclavicular fractures. J Trauma 43(5):778–783PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Canadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society (2007) Nonoperative treatment compared with plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. A multicenter, randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg 89-A:1–10Google Scholar
- Collinge C, Devinney S, Herscovici D, DiPasquale T, Sanders R (2006) Anterior-inferior plate fixation of middle-third fractures and nonunions of the clavicle. J Orthop Trauma 20(10):680–686Google Scholar
- Constant CR, Murley AG (1987) A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 214:160–164PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Denard PJ, Koval KJ, Cantu RV, Weinstein JN (2005) Management of midshaft clavicle fractures in adults. Am J Orthop 34:527–536PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Enneking T, Hartlief MT, Fontijne W (1999) Rush pin fixation for midshaft clavicular nonunions: good results in 13/14 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 70:514–516Google Scholar
- Harrington MJ, Keller TS, Seiler JI, Weikert DR, Moeljanto E, Schwartz HS (1993) Geometric properties and the predicted mechanical behavior of adult human clavicles. J Biomech 26:417–426PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hill JM, McGuire MH, Crosby LA (1997) Closed treatment of displaced middle-third fractures of the clavicle gives poor results. J Bone Joint Surg 79-B(4) 537-539
- Iannotti MR, Crosby LA, Stafford P, Grayson G, Goulet R (2002) Effects of plate location and selection on the stability of midshaft clavicle osteotomies: a biomechanical study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11:457–462Google Scholar
- Jeffrey EB, Robert PN, Eric JG (1998) Débridement of partial-thickness tears of the rotator cuff without acromioplasty, long-term follow-up and review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg 80:733–748Google Scholar
- Jeray K (2007) Acute midshaft clavicular fracture. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 15:239–248PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jubel A, Andermahr J, Schiffer G, Tsironis K, Rehm KE (2003) Elastic stable intramedullary nailing of midclavicular fractures with a titanium nail. Clin Orthop Relat Res 408:279–285Google Scholar
- Kloen P, Sorkin AT, Rubel IF, Helfet DL (2002) Anteroinferior plating of midshaft clavicular nonunions. J Orthop Trauma 16:425–430PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lehr R (1992) Sixteen S-squared over D-squared: a relation for crude sample size estimates. Stat Med 11:1099–1102PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liu HP, Chang CH, Lin PJ, Chu JJ, Hsieh HC, Chang JP et al (1993) Pulmonary artery perforation after Kirschner wire migration: case report and review of the literature. J Trauma 34:154–156PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Moseley HF (1968) The clavicle: its anatomy and function. Clin Orthop 58:17–27Google Scholar
- Neer CS (1960) Nonunion of the clavicle. JAMA 172:1006–1011View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ngarmukos C, Parkpian V, Patradul A (1998) Fixation of fractures of the midshaft of the clavicle with Kirschner wires. Results in 108 patients. J Bone Joint Surg 80-B:106-108
- Niemeier U, Zimmermann HG (1990) Kuntscher’s open intramedullary nailing of the clavicle: an alternative in the treatment of an old clavicular fracture. Chirurg 61:464–466 (in German)Google Scholar
- Norrell HJ, Llewellyn RC (1965) Migration of a threaded Steinmann pin from an acromioclavicular joint into the spinal canal. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg 47-A:1024–1026Google Scholar
- Poigenfurst J, Rappold G, Fischer W (1992) Plating of fresh clavicular fractures: results of 122 operations. Injury 23(4):237–241PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Postacchini F, Gumina S, De Santis P, Albo F (2002) Epidemiology of clavicle fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11(5):452–456PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rehm KE, Andermahr J, Jubel A (2005) Intramedullary nailing of midclavicular fractures with an elastic titanium nail. Eur J Traum Emerg Surg 31(4)
- Robinson CM (1998) Fractures of the clavicle in the adult. Epidemiology and classification. J Bone Joint Surg 80-B:476–484Google Scholar
- Robinson CM, Court-Brown CM, McQueen MM, Wakefield AE (2004). Estimating the risk of nonunion following nonoperative treatment of a clavicular fracture. J Bone Joint Surg 86-A:1359–1365Google Scholar
- Rowe CR (1968) An atlas of anatomy and treatment of midclavicular fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 58:29–42Google Scholar
- Schwarz N, Hocker K (1992) Osteosynthesis of irreducible fractures of the clavicle with 2.7-mm ASIF plates. J Trauma 33:179–183PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vasili C, Duckworth D, Bokor D (2002) Mid-shaft fractures of the clavicle: a retrospective comparison of plate versus intramedullary fixation. J Bone Joint Surg 84-B(Proceedings):279–280
- Widner L, Riddewood H (1980) The value of the lordotic view in diagnosis of fractured clavicle. Int Radiol 5:69–70Google Scholar
- Wild LM, Potter J (2006) Deficits following nonoperative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. J Bone Joint Surg 88-A:35-40
- Zlowodzki M, Zelle BA, Cole PA, Jeray K, McKee MD, Evidence-Based Orthopaedic Trauma Working Group (2005) Treatment of acute midshaft clavicle fractures: systematic review of fractures: on behalf of the Evidence-Based Orthopaedic Trauma Working Group. J Orthop Trauma 19:504–507PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar