Late diagnosis of medial condyle fracture of the humerus with rotational displacement in a child
© The Author(s) 2011
Received: 5 October 2010
Accepted: 1 August 2011
Published: 31 August 2011
For displaced medial condyle fractures in children, open reduction with internal fixation seems to be most popular treatment method. The major complication of this method is failure to make the proper early diagnosis. Corrective supracondylar humeral osteotomy has been preferred to open reduction and internal fixation for managing malunited fragments. We report a case of a child with nonunion of the medial condyle of the humerus who was subsequently treated successfully with open reduction and internal fixation.
KeywordsLate diagnosis Open reduction Medial condyle Humerus Child
Fracture of the medial condyle of the humerus in a child is rare. Kilfoyle classified these fractures into three types according to the degree of displacement. He achieved favorable results with open reduction and internal fixation even in complete and displaced fractures (type 3) by diagnosing them early . Many authors have reported uniformly poor outcome for these fractures when diagnosed late and treated with open reduction and internal fixation [2–5]. We report the case of a child with nonunion of the medial condyle of the humerus with restricted and painful elbow range of motion (ROM) and cubitus varus deformity who was treated successfully with open reduction and internal fixation.
Fracture of the medial condyle of the humerus is a rare injury in children, comprising 1–2% of all pediatric elbow fractures [2, 5, 6, 8]. Diagnosing such fractures radiologically can be difficult in younger children because the fracture is primarily through the cartilage, and the trochlea is not completely ossified until around the age of 9 years [2, 6, 7]. Pain, swelling, ecchymosis over the medial elbow, and radiographic findings of “a few radiodensities” far medial to the elbow are important diagnostic clues to this fracture. If this constellation of signs and symptoms is seen, other diagnostic modalities, such as MRI, ultrasonograph, arthrogram, and computed tomography are indicated. Several researchers have reported a high risk of avascular necrosis in surgical treatment of nonunion medial condylar fractures because takedown of the forearm flexor is required to expose the fracture site [1–3]. Better functional results are achieved by accepting a nonunion than by the acquired avascular necrosis . Corrective supracondylar osteotomy has been considered a preferred alternative to open reduction and internal fixation of the nonunited fragment to correct the deformity and improve elbow ROM in patients in whom the fracture is discovered late . We had favorable results with open reduction and internal fixation, with no serious complications. Although it is difficult to draw conclusions from one case only, we believe that leaving the flexor muscle attached to the fracture fragment is important to prevent trochlea avascular necrosis. As medial condyle fractures are intra-articular Salter Harris type IV injuries, early diagnosis is extremely important to obtain good result without serious complications [2, 7, 9]. Therefore, if there is clinical suspicion of medial condyle fracture, the patient must be further evaluated for early fracture detection.
Conflict of interest
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
- Kilfoyle R (1965) Fractures of the medial condyle and epicondyle of the elbow in children. Clin Orthop 41:43–50PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fowles JV, Kassab MT (1980) Displaced fractures of the medial humeral condyle in children. J Bone Jt Surg Am 62:1159–1163Google Scholar
- Hanspal RS (1985) Injury to the medial condyle in a child reviewed after 18 years. J Bone Jt Surg Br 67:638–639Google Scholar
- Cothay DM (1967) Injury to the lower medial epiphysis of the humerus before development of the ossific centre. Report of a case. J Bone Jt Surg Br 49:766–767Google Scholar
- Chacha PB (1970) Fracture of the medial condyle of the humerus with rotational displacement: report of two cases. J Bone Jt Surg Am 52:1453–1458Google Scholar
- Fahey JJ, O’Brien ET (1971) Fracture-separation of the medial humeral condyle in a child confused with fracture of the medial epicondyle. J Bone Jt Surg Am 53:1102–1104Google Scholar
- Leets AI, Young C, Hoffer MM (2002) Medial condyle fractures of the humerus in children. J Pediatr Orthop 22:2–7Google Scholar
- Papavasiliou V, Nenopoulos S, Venturis T (1987) Fracture of the medial condyle of the humerus in childhood. J Pediatr Orthop 7(4):421–423PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bensahel H, Csukonyi Z, Badelon D, Badaoui S (1986) Fractures of the medial condyle of the humerus in children. J Pediatr Orthop 6:430–433PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar